|
Session 2:
Risk & Risk-Based Decision Making
Integrating
Physical Models and Exposure Models for Risk Assessment
Ralph A. Perona,
Neptune and Company, Los Alamos, NM
Using
Geostatistics and Risk Assessment to Minimize Remediation
Ronald J. Kotun,
Tetra Tech NUS, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA
The
Use of the Biostat Troysan 142® in a Permeable Reactive
Barrier (PRB) and its Potential Effects on Public Health
and the Environment
Dan Huber, MA DEP,
Boston, MA
Implications
of the NTP's Finding of Naphthalene Carcinogenicity for
Risk Assessment of Mixtures
Jo Anne Shatkin,
Menzie-Cura & Associates, Inc., Chelmsford, MA
Brownfields
to Parks: Enhancing Urban Greenspace Using Risk-Based
Cleanups
Michael W.
Ehlebracht, Hart Crowser, Seattle, WA
Privatized, Risk-Based Decision-Making in Massachusetts
Hazardous Waste Site Cleanups
Carol Bois, Bois
Consulting Company, Framingham, MA
Integrating
Physical Models and Exposure Models for Risk Assessment
Ralph A. Perona and Mark F. Tardiff, Neptune and
Company
A conceptual site model that integrates attributes of
both the physical environment and human exposure pathways
is necessary for identifying data needs to support
credible risk estimates in complex systems. Aspects of a
risk assessment for contaminated soil or sediment that are
related to both physical and exposure models include
bioavailability, geomorphological sorting of particles,
and particle size effects on chemical concentration. In a
recent investigation at a copper mining operation a
sampling design based on stream geomorphology was used to
collect data to test a conceptual site model. Metals
concentration data for multiple particle size fractions
were obtained within three types of sediment deposits
(channel, bars, and overbanks) over several miles of an
ephemeral stream that had received mining-related
discharges. Statistical analyses and risk assessment
calculations were performed with these data to identify
risk-driving metals and exposure pathways. The output of
these calculations was then used to identify additional
data needs for reducing uncertainty in risk estimates to
acceptable levels. These data needs included additional
information on background concentrations of key metals,
likely metal concentrations in plant and animal foodstuffs
raised on-site, and the variability and correlation in
average concentrations of key metals with geographic
location and particle size. The authors will demonstrate
how addressing each of these data needs required a
synthesis of information related to physical and exposure
models.
Using
Geostatistics and Risk Assessment to Minimize Remediation
Ronald J. Kotun, Ph.D., Tetra Tech NUS, Inc.
Geostatistics, kriging, and risk assessment are used
together to minimize the amount of remediation required to
attain target risk. A simple assumption in exposure
assessment is that individuals randomly move throughout an
exposure unit. Therefore, the exposure concentration
contacted over a period of time can be estimated by the
average concentration of the samples collected within that
exposure unit. To account for uncertainty, this exposure
concentration is typically represented by the upper
confidence limit of the mean (UCL). Using a nonparametric
technique, such as bootstrapping, to determine the UCL
removes the need to establish the distribution of the
data. Risks are typically estimated by using the UCL. If
the UCL is greater than the cleanup level, then remedial
action is necessary. However, the exceedance of a cleanup
level by an individual sample does not necessarily
indicate a significant exceedance of a target risk.
Therefore, attainment of a cleanup level will indicate
that a sample with a concentration greater than the
cleanup level can remain in place, assuming that there is
adequate representation within the exposure unit. The most
contaminated soil samples are identified for removal until
the UCL is less than the cleanup level. The samples
proposed for remediation are replaced with a
"post-remediation" concentration, such as
one-half the detection limit, to calculate a post-remedial
UCL. When this UCL is less than the cleanup level, there
is attainment. The maximum concentration remaining is
referred to as the "pick-up level."
Geostatistics and kriging can be used to define the areas
that need to be excavated. Areas targeted for remediation
are based on the "pick-up level." Geostatistics,
in combination with use of the "pick-up level,"
significantly reduce the amount of remediation necessary
to attain the target risk, relative to treating all soil
with concentrations greater than the cleanup level.
The
Use of the Biostat Troysan 142® in a Permeable Reactive
Barrier (PRB) and its Potential Effects on Public Health
and the Environment
Dan Huber, MA DEP; Diane
Manganaro, MA DEP; Patrick Hurley, MA DEP; Janine
Commerford, MA DEP; and Peter Richards, MA DEP
Permeable Reactive Barriers
(PRBs) are in situ groundwater treatment systems
that use zero-valent iron filings to break down
chlorinated solvents or other hazardous water soluble
chemicals to harmless constituents. These treatment
systems are gaining in popularity throughout the country
as a means to combat highly polluted groundwater, and are
attractive due to their lower Operation and Maintenance
(O&M) costs. The construction of the PRBs is best
completed using a slurry, which consists of a guar gum, to
support the trench during excavation. The excavation is
done in large sections and as a section is completed, the
reactive matrix of sand and iron filings acts to displace
the slurry. In order to slow microbial breakdown of the
guar gum mixture, a biostat called Troysan 142® which is
also known as Dazomet®
(tetrahydro-3,5-dimethyl-2H-1,3,5-thiadiazine-2-thione) is
added to the slurry mix. Under more common usage patterns,
this chemical is used as a surface soil sterilizer in the
silviculture or agricultural industries and quickly
volatilizes to the atmosphere. In these surface soils, it
quickly decomposes to other toxic compounds such as methyl
isothiocyanate, formaldehyde, and hydrogen sulfide, among
others. Data on the fate/transport and breakdown in the
subsurface aquifer, however, are extremely limited. The
DEP became familiar with this technology as a result of a
proposal to use it at a site to treat groundwater
contaminated with chlorinated solvents. The site, which is
upgradient of a Zone I designated drinking water area,
aroused interest at DEP because of the potential health
implications of releasing this chemical into a potential
drinking water zone. In addition, the site was situated
upgradient of a wetlands area and the DEP was concerned
about potential ecological effects to the receptors in the
wetland. The contractor, however, was unprepared to
provide the DEP with the necessary documentation regarding
the toxicity, fate/transport, and the breakdown products.
Inquiries to the state’s Food and Agriculture division
and the EPA’s Office of Pesticide Program showed no
indication that this chemical was suitable for use in an
aquifer. As a result of these concerns by MA DEP, the
contractor elected to alter its construction methods
thereby eliminating the need for this chemical in the
construction process.
Implications
of the NTP’s Finding of Naphthalene Carcinogenicity for
Risk Assessment of Mixtures
Jo Anne Shatkin, Ph.D. Menzie-Cura & Associates,
Inc.
The National Toxicology Program (NTP) recently
completed their two year bioassay of naphthalene, and
concluded there was, "clear evidence of
carcinogenicity" of the compound in rats. Recent work
on whole mixture toxicity of coal tar also found
significant cancer potency independent of benzo(a)pyrene,
long thought to be the "bad actor" on which the
relative potency of other DNA adduct-forming polycyclic
aromatic compounds is based. These and other recent
findings on coal tar component carcinogenicity are signals
that the current relative potency model of toxicity for
risk assessment is inaccurate for this mixture. These
findings beg for a more holistic approach to mixture
toxicity evaluation for coal tar, and for mixtures
generally. This work reviews recent work on coal tar
component toxicity, considers the implications for risk
assessment, and proposes alternative approaches for
assessing the toxicity of coal tar and other mixture
toxicity, including those that provide a consistent
framework for both human and ecological toxicity.
Brownfields
to Parks: Enhancing Urban Greenspace using Risk-Based
Cleanups
Michael W. Ehlebracht and Steven J. Germiat, Hart
Crowser
Application of risk-based cleanup approaches to
contaminated brownfield sites have significantly enhanced
opportunities for converting barren pieces of land into
much needed urban greenspace. Three case studies
illustrate how risk-based cleanup approaches have allowed
park developers to dramatically reduce cleanup costs while
being protective of human health and the environment. A
large former bulk fuel oil facility in downtown Seattle is
being redeveloped into a sculpture park.
Petroleum-impacted soil and groundwater still remain at
the site, particularly under a major city arterial. Cost
estimates for excavating residual impacted soils exceeding
generic cleanup criteria totaled over $4,000,000. To
minimize cleanup costs, a supplemental field investigation
and modeling program was implemented to evaluate exposure
pathways of concern under the future park land-use
scenario. We demonstrated to state regulators that
residual petroleum would not impact the adjacent marine
environment and that emission of soil vapors would not
likely pose a significant risk to park users. The cleanup
action plan (CAP), which was approved as part of a consent
decree, allows more resources to be used for park
development rather than unnecessary environmental cleanup.
Risk-based cleanup approaches were used to facilitate the
purchase and redevelopment of a former bulk fuel oil site
into a maritime park and education center. In order to
meet an aggressive purchase deadline, an RI/FS and CAP
were completed within three months. Use of
fraction-specific petroleum analysis and risk-based
cleanup approaches significantly reduced projected cleanup
costs and allowed the project to move forward.
Redevelopment of the former Dickman Mill timber mill into
a waterfront park provided for significant restoration of
intertidal habitat, while creating an upland lawn area for
public access. The cleanup remedy, implemented
cost-effectively as a component of park construction,
addressed potential risks under the site’s future use as
a waterfront park/intertidal habitat.
Privatized,
Risk-Based Decision-Making in Massachusetts Hazardous
Waste Site Cleanups
Deirdre C. Menoyo, BWSC, MA DEP, Rosemary Knox, MA DEP,
Carol de Groot Bois, Bois Consulting Company, R. Duff
Collins, Woodard & Curran
In 1993, Massachusetts implemented significant
revisions to the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP)
regulations in a unique approach to expediting
investigation and remediation of hazardous waste sites.
These revisions included "privatizing" the
majority of the cleanup work, that is, allowing private
parties to have greater control of their investigation and
remediation projects under the supervision of Licensed
Site Professionals (LSPs), eliminating a significant
amount of direct agency oversight. LSPs are qualified,
experienced scientists or engineers licensed by the
Commonwealth to render professional opinions regarding
investigation and remediation actions at hazardous waste
sites. Other components of the redesigned program included
redirecting the agency’s focus to the sites of highest
priority, from a human health and/or environmental risk
standpoint, promulgating reporting and cleanup standards,
and requiring DEP to audit sites to ensure compliance. In
addition, the regulations allow site-specific, risk-based
cleanups.
The purpose of this paper is to examine the progress of
the redesigned program. A five-year review of the program
in 1998 (finalized in 1999 as a Generic Environmental
Impact Report) concluded that the program had successfully
increased the number of cleanups completed by private
parties and allowed the DEP to concentrate more resources
on serious threats to public health and the environment (DEP,
1999). The site universe in 1994, just after the start of
the program, consisted of almost 7,000 sites. Between 1983
and 1992, response actions were taken at about half of the
sites where a release had been confirmed (DEP, 1993). At
the close of FY 2000, over 14,400 of the 20,000 release
cases reported to the agency since 1993 had been closed.
The overall understanding is that the redesigned
program is working to achieve the intended endpoint of
remediating releases of oil and hazardous materials. The
DEP and the stakeholders in the program, however,
recognize that there has not been enough focus on more
accurate evaluation parameters to determine the progress
of site cleanups and to evaluate how well LSPs and PRPs
are meeting the requirements of the regulations. The DEP
has initiated a long-term project that will evaluate the
efficacy and timeliness of response actions at hazardous
waste sites using more detailed and systematic methods. In
the interim, this paper will present data that is
currently available in order to provide the regulated
community and other stakeholders with updated information
on the redesigned program.
Top
|