Remediation Optimization Achieved by Bundling
Complementary Treatment Technologies
Richard
T. Cartwright, MECX, LLC, East Amherst, NY
R. Thomas Numbers, MECX,
LLC, Williamsburg, VA
Novel
Subsurface Biobarriers to Contain and Remediate
Contaminated Ground Water
Robert
Sharp, Manhattan College, Bronx, NY
Al Cunningham, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT
John Komlos, Jr., Princeton University, Princeton, NJ
Degradation
of Carbon Tetrachloride in a Reducing Groundwater
Environment: Implications for Natural Attenuation
Andy
Davis, Geomega, Boulder, CO
C. Peck, Chevron Environmental Management Co., San Ramon
Treatment
of Contaminated Groundwater Using NanoFeTM
Technology
Harch
Gill, PARS Environmental, Inc., Robbinsville, NJ
Kaiti Liao, PARS Environmental, Inc., Robbinsville, NJ
Optimization
of an Extraction Well Using Three-Dimensional Capture
Zones
Mary
O’Reilly, CH2M HILL, Otis ANG Base, MA
John Glass, CH2M HILL, Herndon, VA
Scott DeHainaut, CH2M HILL, Otis ANG Base, MA
Rose Forbes, Air Force Center for Environmental
Excellence, Otis ANG Base, MA
Remediation
of Petroleum-Containing Soil and Groundwater at a Former
Rail Yard Locomotive Fueling Area
Scott
R. Compston, Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., Latham, NY
Bruce R. Nelson, Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., Latham, NY
Scott A. Underhill, Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., Latham, NY
LeeAnn Thomas, Canadian Pacific Railway, Minneapolis, MN
MRC™
Treatment of a VOC and Metals Impacted Unconsolidated
Aquifer
Jonathan
K. Child, Fuss & O’Neill, Inc., West Springfield, MA
Timothy J. St. Germain, Fuss & O’Neill, Inc., West
Springfield, MA
Remediation
Optimization Achieved by Bundling Complementary Treatment
Technologies
Richard
T. Cartwright, P.E., CHMM, Vice President, MECX,
LLC, 8096 Clarherst Drive, East Amherst, NY 14051, Tel:
713-412-9697, Fax: 713-585-7049, Email: richard.cartwright@mecx.net
R. Thomas
Numbers, P.E., Vice President, MECX, LLC, 3005 Margaret Jones Lane,
Williamsburg, VA 23185, Tel: 757-220-6666, Fax:
757-220-3396, Email: thomas.numbers@mecx.net
An
innovative sequence of four bundled complementary in-situ
soil and groundwater treatment technologies has been
developed to reduce total contaminant mass encountered at
difficult to treat remediation sites. The first step is to
pre-condition low permeability soils using either chemical
and/or mechanical means.
The
second step is to apply an optimized enhancement of the
Traditional Fenton’s Reagent chemical oxidation process.
Unlike previous applications of Traditional Fenton’s
Reagent, the new emphasis is on optimization of the
“Total Contaminant Mass Desorption Process”.
High
temperature (greater than 180oF) applications
in the saturated zone have resulted in runaway reactions
when the lower explosion limits (LEL) were exceeded. Low
temperature (less than 100oF) applications have
resulted in problems with dissolved phase contaminant
concentration rebound. The new optimized approach, whereby
the saturated zone temperature is maintained consistently
between 140oF and 170oF, effectively
desorbs both adsorbed and absorbed contaminants from the
soil matrix.
The
desorption extraction step facilitates the third and
fourth steps, which are biotreatment polishing steps used
to reduce total contaminant mass transferred from the soil
matrix into the dissolved phase in the saturated zone. The
third step is an aerobic treatment process, which
optimally produces stable concentrations of dissolved
oxygen to biodegrade hydrocarbons in the contaminated
groundwater. A patented process of water electrolysis used
with a submersible pump and packer system recirculates
oxygen enriched groundwater into the aquifer. It moves
water only in recirculation. No water is withdrawn from
the aquifer and no handling of water or permitting is
required.
If
chlorinated contaminants are also present, a fourth
anaerobic treatment process is employed. Emulsified
food-grade soybean oil is then injected into the aquifer,
which slowly dissolves over several years providing a
carbon and energy source to accelerate biodegradation.
This innovative sequence of four complementary treatment
technologies optimizes the reduction of total contaminant
mass.
Novel
Subsurface Biobarriers to Contain and Remediate
Contaminated Ground Water
Robert
Sharp, Manhattan College Dept. of Environmental
Engineering, 3825 Corlear Avenue, Rm 314, Bronx, NY 10463,
Tel:
718-862-7169, Fax: 718-862-8018, Email: Robert.sharp@manhattan.edu
Al Cunningham, Montana State University, Center for
Biofilm Engineering, 312 EPS Building,
Bozeman, MT, Tel: 406-994-6109, Email: Al_C@erc.montana.edu
John Komlos, Jr., Department of Civil and
Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, E-125
Engineering Quad, Princeton, NJ 08544, Tel: 609-258-5805,
Email: jkomlos@princeton.edu
This
paper describes over a decade of work including laboratory
studies, pilot studies and a field demonstrations to
develop effective multi-purpose subsurface biobarriers
that can be used to significantly decrease the hydraulic
conductivity of an aquifer, while simultaneously
mineralizing toxic groundwater contaminants.
These novel biobarriers rely on starved cell
technology to properly place and construct subsurface
barriers using environmental isolates obtained at the
contaminated sites.
The
types of starved cell biobarriers that have been developed
include single specie static biobarriers for plume
containment and saltwater intrusion abatement, reactive
biobarriers for containment and degradation of BTEX and
nitrate, and dual-species reactive biobarriers for
containment and degradation of chlorinated compounds. One example includes a field demonstration of a reactive
subsurface biological barrier that has been in operation
for 4 years. Results
indicate that the biobarrier can reduce permeability by
more than three orders of magnitude over an extended
period of time without significant maintenance. Simultaneously, this biobarrier can degrade high
concentrations of nitrate (> 100 mg/l) to meet drinking
water standards (< 10 mg/l).
Other single specie reactive barriers that have
been developed include one capable of degrading BTEX and
TCE. Bench-scale
studies were used to develop a dual-species reactive
biobarrier aimed at mineralizing TCE.
This reactive biobarrier combines a well
characterized TCE degrading environmental isolate with the
facultative biofilm producer used in the field study to
produce a dual species biofilm capable of partially
plugging porous media (90% reduction in K) while
completely mineralizing TCE.
In addition, the results demonstrate that varying
nutrient feed can be used to control both TCE degradation
rates and hydraulic conductivity reduction.
Additional field installations of this novel
technology are planned, including barriers to remediate
TCE, gasoline and MTBE plumes.
Currently, work is being carried out to develop
starved-cell biobarriers that can remediate heavy metals
and radionuclides.
Degradation
of Carbon Tetrachloride in a Reducing Groundwater
Environment: Implications for Natural Attenuation
Andy
Davis, Geomega, 2995 Baseline Road, Suite 202, Boulder, CO
80303, Tel: 303-938-8115, Email: andy@geomega.com
C. Peck, Chevron Environmental Management Co., 6001
Bollinger Canyon Road, San Ramon 94583
Several
laboratory experiments have demonstrated degradation of
carbon tetrachloride (CT) in groundwater, but there appear
to have been no corroborating long-term field studies.
Investigations conducted in 1989 and 1999 at an industrial
site constructed on an infilled estuarine environment in
France provide data over a decade for which CT degradation
could be evaluated. A Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (DNAPL)
containing oil and >90% CT that was present in 1989 was
absent in the extremely reducing site groundwater in both
1999 and 2000 (average Eh = -170 mV at pH 7, sulfide up to
21 mg L-1, and Fe+2 up to 3.2 mg L-1).
These conditions facilitated dechlorination of CT to
chloroform (CF) present at up to 46 mg L-1, and
methylene chloride (up to 75 mg L-1). Carbon
disulfide (CS2), a terminal degradation product
in reducing environments in laboratory experiments, was
present at a mass ratio averaging 2.4:1 CF:CS2,
indicative of abiotic degradation. The lack of detection
of the separate phase CT, the ratio of CF:CS2,
the presence of low molecular weight organic acids (i.e.,
acetate ~900 mg L-1; citrate 360 mg L-1;
and propionate, up to 111 mg L-1) and pyrite in
conjunction with excess inorganic Cl in groundwater are
all indicators of ongoing degradation of the chlorinated
compounds. However, while natural attenuation of
chloromethanes may be a viable adjunct to strategies
designed to remediate CT in reducing groundwater, its
efficacy is hard to quantify in complex field environments
where upgradient sources are still present.
Treatment
of Contaminated Groundwater Using NanoFeTM
Technology
Harch
Gill, Ph. D., PARS Environmental, Inc., 6A South Gold
Drive, Robbinsville, NJ 08691, Tel: 609-890-7277, Fax:
609-890-9116, Email: hgill@parsenviro.com
Kaiti Liao, PARS Environmental, Inc., 6A South Gold Drive,
Robbinsville, NJ 08691, Tel: 609-890-7277, Fax:
609-890-9116, Email: kliao@parsenviro.com
NanoFeTM
Technology is an innovative remediation technology for
treating a wide range of recalcitrant contaminants.
NanoFe consists of supported submicron (<10-6
meter), bacteria-sized particles of zero valent iron
(Fe0) and trace amounts of a noble metal
catalyst. NanoFe
is an extremely versatile remediation tool given its high
reactivity and extremely small particle size (typical
particle sizes are on the order of 10-100 nanometers).
NanoFe can effect the rapid destruction of a wide
range of recalcitrant contaminants on either an in-situ
or ex-situ basis. In the in-situ application, a slurry mixture of NanoFe
and water is injected under pressure or by gravity into
the contaminant plume.
These particles have good flow characteristics and
remain in suspension over extended periods of time to flow
with the groundwater, while offering high reactivity that
can dechlorinate chlorinated hydrocarbon contaminants.
NanoFeTM
Technology has been applied at several sites to treat
groundwater contaminated with a variety of chlorinated
hydrocarbons. The
injected NanoFe significantly reduces the concentrations
of chlorinated contaminants within approximately three
days. Additionally,
the injected NanoFe produced reducing conditions that
fostered continuing natural attenuation of contaminants.
This paper presents the results from several field
applications and evaluates the distribution and
effectiveness of the NanoFe.
Optimization
of an Extraction Well Using Three-Dimensional Capture
Zones
Mary
O’Reilly, CH2M HILL, 318 East Inner Road, Otis ANG Base,
MA 02542, Tel: 508-968-4670 ext 5629, Fax: 508-968-4490,
Email: moreilly@ch2m.com
John Glass, CH2M HILL, 13921 Park Center Road, Suite 600,
Herndon, VA 20171-5416, Tel: 703-471-1441 ext 4341, Fax:
703-471-1508, Email: jglass@ch2m.com
Scott DeHainaut, CH2M HILL, 318 East Inner Road, Otis ANG
Base, MA 02542, Tel: 508-968-4670 ext 5629, Fax:
508-968-4490, Email: sdehaina@ch2m.com
Rose Forbes, Air Force Center for Environmental
Excellence, 318 East Inner Road, Otis ANG Base, MA 02542,
Tel: 508-968-4670 ext 5613, Fax: 508-968-4490, Email: rose.forbes@brooks.af.mil
Aquifer
remediation at several groundwater contamination sites on
the Massachusetts Military Reservation (MMR) is being
expedited by periodic optimization of the extraction,
treatment, and reinjection systems.
Optimization activities may involve adjustment of
pumping and reinjection rates, addition or removal of
wells, or packing off sections of well screens to focus
remediation efforts on the most critical depth intervals.
Because groundwater flow is fully
three-dimensional, system modifications are guided by a
combination of groundwater monitoring and
three-dimensional modeling.
An example is a single-well hydraulic containment
system that was installed to intercept a long, narrow
trichloroethene (TCE) plume that passes beneath a 1000
foot land mass between two ponds before the plume
discharges into the downgradient pond. Based
on monitoring results from 1999, the TCE plume was
delineated with a width of 50 to 75 feet, a thickness of
less than 50 feet, and concentrations ranging up to 2200
micrograms per liter (µg/L).
Since startup of the extraction well in January
2000, the plume trajectory has shifted, and TCE has not
been detected at concentrations exceeding the maximum
contaminant level of 5 µg/L in the upgradient monitoring
network. However,
influent concentrations at the extraction well remain
consistent with the original plume delineation, with
concentrations ranging up to 90 µg/L at a pumping rate of
150 gallons per minute (gpm).
To optimize the performance of the well and locate
the shifted plume, a field investigation program was
designed, based on the results of three-dimensional
hydraulic capture-zone delineation using the groundwater
flow model. Investigation
results and additional modeling of optimization scenarios
were used to focus the extraction stress on the most
contaminated portion of the aquifer while maintaining
hydraulic containment of the plume.
Remediation
of Petroleum-Containing Soil and Groundwater at a Former
Rail Yard Locomotive Fueling Area
Scott
R. Compston, Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 15 Cornell Road,
Latham, NY 12110, Tel: 518-786-7349, Fax: 518-786-8645,
Email: scompston@pirnie.com
Bruce R. Nelson, Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 15 Cornell Road,
Latham, NY 12110, Tel: 518-786-7349, Fax: 518-786-8645m
Email: bnelson@pirnie.com
Scott A. Underhill, Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 15 Cornell Road,
Latham, NY 12110, Tel: 518-786-7349, Fax: 518-786-8645,
Email: sunderhill@pirnie.com
LeeAnn Thomas, Canadian Pacific Railway, 501 Marquette
Avenue, Suite 804, Minneapolis, MN 55402, Tel:
612-904-6130, Fax: 612-904-6147, Email: leeann_thomas@cpr.ca
Malcolm
Pirnie, Inc. implemented a multi-faceted remedial program
at a former locomotive fueling area (FLFA) at a rail yard
in upstate New York to address diesel-affected soil and
groundwater. Mainline
tracks running through the FLFA prohibited removal of
affected soil and, consequently, an in-situ remedy was
developed. The
remedy combines air sparging to provide oxygen to
intrinsic diesel-degrading microorganisms and to
volatilize petroleum compounds, and soil vapor extraction
to actively remove volatilized diesel compounds from the
subsurface. System components include vapor extraction and air sparging
wells within the FLFA and low flow biosparging wells
between the FLFA and down gradient properties.
The biosparging wells create an oxygen barrier to
migrating diesel compounds.
Based on vapor extraction flow rates and the
concentration of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in
extracted air, an estimated 1,000 pounds of petroleum mass
have been removed by the vapor extraction system to date.
Mass removal and biological activity is strongly
correlated with seasonal fluctuations in subsurface
temperature, which varies by more than eight degrees
Celsius in the treatment zone over the course of a year.
Analyses of microbial biomass in the treatment area
indicate that diesel-degrading organisms increased by four
orders of magnitude in unsaturated soil and by three
orders of magnitude in saturated soil within five months
of system start up. Regulated
VOC concentrations in soil have decreased between 83 and
98 percent, while regulated semi-volatile organic compound
(SVOC) concentrations in soil have decreased by as much as
90 percent in the treatment area in approximately 18
months. Concentrations
of petroleum compounds in groundwater have been reduced to
less than standards over the majority of the site.
This integrated in-situ approach to the treatment
of diesel-impacted soil and groundwater has greatly
reduced cleanup costs and cleanup time for the site.
MRC™
Treatment of a VOC and Metals Impacted Unconsolidated
Aquifer
Jonathan
K. Child, Fuss & O’Neill, Inc., 78 Interstate Drive,
West Springfield, MA
01089, Tel: 413-452-0445 x4414, Email:
jchild@fando.com
Timothy J. St. Germain, Fuss & O’Neill, Inc., 78
Interstate Drive, West Springfield, MA
01089, Tel: 413-452-0445 x4412, Email: tgermain@fando.com
In-situ
metals and chlorinated solvents remediation with Metals
Remediation Compound (MRC™) is being evaluated as a
method for remediating a mixed chlorinated volatile
organic compound (VOC) and dissolved metals plume at a
former plating facility in Massachusetts.
MRC™ is a new, injectable remedial additive
developed by Regenesis, San Clemente, CA for the in-situ
treatment of co-mingled metal and solvent plumes.
The MRC™ product is designed to release a
polylactate polymer and a benign organosulfur compound to
groundwater and facilitate enhanced reductive
dechlorination of chlorinated VOCs and the formation of
insoluble metal-sulfide solids to immobilize dissolved
metals.
The
primary constituents of concern at the site are
chlorintated VOCs (primarily 1,1,1-trichlorethane and
tetrachloroethene) and dissolved nickel.
The source of the release is a former plating
facility and associated drywell.
Removal of the drywell and approximately 320 tons
of soil was conducted in July 2000.
Post-excavation assessment and monitoring
activities indicate that residual impacts remain in the
vicinity of the former drywell source area.
Additional remedial measures are required to
achieve further source reduction and prevent off-site
contaminant migration.
The
MRC™ Pilot Test was initiated in December 2003 with the
injection of 540 pounds of MRC™ by GeoprobeŇ
within an approximate 250 square foot area.
MRC™ was injected over an approximate 15-foot
vertical interval between a depth of approximately 5 and
20 feet at nine locations.
A baseline groundwater monitoring event was
conducted one day prior to MRC™ injections.
Geochemical effects of the MRC™ injection are
being monitored through three post-injection groundwater
monitoring events conducted over a six month period.
Each monitoring event includes the measurement of
field parameters and a comprehensive suite of laboratory
analyses including contaminants of concern, dissolved
gases, metabolic acids, and a variety of inorganic
parameters.
Top
|