Environmental Stewardship and Proactive Management at Small Arms Ranges
Sponsored by AMEC Earth and Environmental

Environmental Range Management
Michael Warminsky, PE, AMEC Earth and Environmental

Environmental Management at Operating Outdoor Small Arms Firing Ranges
Mark Begley, Environmental Management Commission, Massachusetts Military Reservation, Camp Edwards, MA

Update of the RangeSafe Program
Greg O’Connor, Picatinny Arsenal RDE-COM/ARDEC

Suppression of Tungsten's Leachability in Water
Hans-Joachim Lunk, OSRAM Sylvania, Towanda, PA

A Challenge for the Applicability of Regulatory Leaching Tests for Assessing Lead Leachability in Shooting Range Soils: Comparison of TCLP and SPLP
Xinde Cao, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ

Use of Predictive Models for Characterization of Trap and Skeet Ranges: Case Studies and Model Results
David Mackie, AMEC Earth and Environmental

 

Environmental Management at Operating Outdoor Small Arms Firing Ranges

Mark Begley, Environmental Management Commission, Massachusetts Military Reservation, Building 1204, Camp Edwards, MA 02542, Tel: 508 946-2871, Fax: 508 968-5128, Email: Mark.Begley@state.ma.us
Bonnie Packer, U.S. Army Environmental Center, SFIMAEC-PCT, 5179 Hadley Rd, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 21010, Tel: 410-436-6846, Fax: 410 436-6836, Email: Bonnie.packer@aec.apgea.army.mil

The Interstate Technology Regulatory Council (ITRC) subgroup on Small Arms Ranges has published (February 2005) its document, “Environmental Management at Operating Outdoor Small Arms Firing Ranges.”  In addition to making this document widely available on its web page (http://www.itrcweb.org/gd_SMART.asp), the ITRC also provides free internet based training and class room training (2005) which aids small arms range managers in proactively managing environmental issues on their ranges. 

Constituents from small arms projectiles, targets, and primers used at a range can potentially migrate in the environment. Depending on the depth of groundwater, climate, soil chemistry, or proximity to surface water at the range, constituents can reach groundwater or surface waters.

Well-designed and -managed ranges should incur only manageable environmental issues during operation. Environmental conditions at operating ranges need to be evaluated, however, to delineate any existing and potential risks to the environment. Upon identifying a problem, measures should to be undertaken to correct, prevent or minimize adverse environmental impacts.

The ITRC document and training are intended to help minimize potential exposures to lead and other materials associated with shooting ranges. They are designed to assist range operators in developing, using, and monitoring environmental management plans at their active outdoor small arms firing ranges. The central task in formulating an environmental management plan is the selection and implementation of effective and reliable pollution prevention and mitigation measures, otherwise referred to as “best management practices” (BMPs). The document and training developed by a partnership among state and federal environmental representatives, Department of Defense, shooting sports industry, and stakeholders, focuses on providing range operators with the guidance they need to identify and undertake BMPs that are appropriate for and tailored to the site-specific environmental conditions at their ranges.

Suppression of Tungsten’s Leachability in Water

Dr. Hans-Joachim Lunk, OSRAM Sylvania, Hawes Street, Towanda, PA 18848, Tel: 570-268-5503, Email: hans-joachim.lunk@sylvania.com
Dr. Sheema Roychowdhury, OSRAM Sylvania, Hawes Street, Towanda, PA 18848, Tel: 570-268-5373, Email: sheema.roychowdhury@sylvania.com.

The next generation of bullets and other projectiles for use in small arms is relying on new and at the same time non-toxic materials to reproduce the density and properties of lead.  The primary materials of choice for the high-density components are tungsten and tungsten alloys.

The experimental data of a leachability study of pure tungsten and ceramic-coated tungsten is presented.

The extent and rate of tungsten’s leachability in water under aerobic conditions first of all depends on the pH.  For the studied pH range 1.5 - 8.5, a pH of 8.5 revealed the most pronounced leachability.  Tungsten’s leachability at pH 1.5 is negligible.The first step of the interaction between tungsten and the oxygen-containing water can be described as follows: W  +  H2O  +  1.5 O2  ®  WO42-  +  2 H+.  Secondly, monotungstate, WO42-, reacts with H+, resulting in the formation of the soluble metatungstate anion [H2W12O40]6-: 12 WO42-  +  18 H+  ®  [H2W12O40]6-  +  8 H2O.

Tungsten’s leachability strongly depends on the surface area.  In descending order of surface area, a tungsten powder is a worst-case scenario followed by a pressed tungsten powder compact, and finally, a sintered tungsten powder part.

By addition of selected metals M, the leachability of tungsten can be significantly suppressed.  The cation Mn+ interacts with [H2W12O40]6-, producing tungstates like MIIWO4 and MIII2(WO4)3, which are characterized by an extremely low solubility.  The addition of selected metals to tungsten powder suppresses the leachability of tungsten to a great extent and at the same time exhibits only a minor leachability.

An alternative way to prevent or greatly minimize the leachability of tungsten consists in adding selected salts or oxides to tungsten.  The solubility of the selected compounds must be slightly higher than the solubility of the tungstates to be formed.

A Challenge for the Applicability of Regulatory Leaching Tests for Assessing Lead Leachability in Shooting Range Soils: Comparison of TCLP and SPLP

Xinde Cao, Center for Environmental Systems, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, Tel: 201-216-5432, Fax: 201-216-8212, Email: xcao@stevens.edu
Dimitris Dermatas, Center for Environmental Systems, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, Tel: 201-216-8916, Fax: 201-216-8212, Email: ddermatas@stevens.edu
Christos Christodoulatos
, Center for Environmental Systems, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, Tel: 201-216-5675, Fax: 201-216-8303, Email: christo@stevens.edu

Contamination of lead (Pb) from use of Pb bullets at shooting range sites has drawn considerable environmental attention. Treatments and/or disposal of contaminated range soils depend upon the leaching potential of Pb. The toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) is the current USEPA standard protocol to evaluate metal leachability. However, application of TCLP to assess Pb leachability from contaminated range soils may be questionable. This study determined Pb leachability in range soils using two USEPA regulatory leaching methods, i.e. TCLP and synthetic precipitation leaching procedure (SPLP). Possible mechanisms that are responsible for Pb leaching in each leaching protocol were elucidated via X-ray powder diffraction. Soil samples were collected from the backstop berms at four shooting ranges, with Pb concentrations as high as 60,600 mg kg-1 soil. Lead concentrations in the TCLP leachate ranged from 3 to 350 mg L-1, with all but one soil exceeding the USEPA non-hazardous waste disposal limit of 5 mg L-1. Furthermore, continued dissolution of metallic Pb and re-precipitation of cerussite prevented the TCLP extraction from reaching equilibrium at the standard leaching time of 18 h. Thus, the standard one-point TCLP test would either over- or under-estimate Pb leachability in range soils. SPLP-Pb levels ranged from 0.021 to 2.6 mg/L, with all soils above the USEPA regulatory limit of 0.015 mg/L. The analytical SPLP results in all soils agreed well with a modeling prediction. In contrast to TCLP, SPLP leaching readily reached equilibrium within standard time of 18h, regardless of pH and Pb concentrations, and the acidic rainfall environment that the SPLP fluid simulates is identical to the condition that the shooting range soil is actually exposed to. Therefore, SPLP is a more appropriate leaching test than TCLP for assessing lead leachability in range soils. This is very important in helping the USEPA in regulating the evaluation of Pb leachability and subsequent treatment of shooting range soils.

Top
   

Past Conference Programs | Home
  
 
  
Design and Hosting by Dot.Inc Group
Copyright © 2000 University of Massachusetts - All rights reserved.