Bioremediation 


Combined Abiotic and Biotic Dechlorination of TCE in a Low Permeability Aerobic Aquifer
Edward Sullivan, The Whitman Companies, Inc., East Brunswick, NJ

Impact of Crude Oil Bioremediation in Soil on Groundwater Quality
James L. Brown, Lockheed Martin/REAC, Edison, NJ

Combined Use of EHC™ plus KB-1™ Dehalococcoides Inoculant for Accelerated ISCR- First Full-Scale Field Application in Ohio, USA
Josephine Molin, Adventus Americus, Inc., Freeport, IL

Bioremediation of Hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,2,5-triazine (RDX) and 1,3,5,7-tetranitroperhydro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX)- Contaminated Sediments
Man Jae Kwon, University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign, Urbana, IL

Bioremediation of Soil Contaminated with Organolead Compounds - Laboratory and Field Studies
Josef Winter, Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany

Anaerobic Bioremediation Results Lead to Alternative Cleanup Levels for Chloroethane Contaminated Groundwater at Connecticut Site
Michael E. Miller, Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc., Cambridge, MA

 

Combined Abiotic and Biotic Dechlorination of TCE in a Low Permeability Aerobic Aquifer  

Edward Sullivan, P.G., The Whitman Companies, Inc., 116 Tices Lane, Unit B-1, East Brunswick, New Jersey.  Tel. 732-30909-5858, Fax 732-30909-09466, Email: esullivan@whitmanco.com
Daniel W. Elliott, Ph.D., The Whitman Companies, Inc., 116 Tices Lane, Unit B-1, East Brunswick, New Jersey.  Tel. 732-30909-5858, Fax 732-30909-09466, delliot@whitmanco.com
Christopher DelMonico, The Whitman Companies, Inc. etc. 116 Tices Lane, Unit B-1, East Brunswick, New Jersey.  Tel. 732-30909-5858, Fax 732-30909-09466, Email:  cdelmonico@whitmanco.com
Eric C. Hince; Geovation Consultants, Inc., 468 Route 17A, Florida, NY, 10921, Tel: 845-651-4141, Fax: 845-651-0040, Email: echince@geovation.com

A pilot study was conducted using nanoscale zero valent iron (nZVI) and emulsified soy oil to promote dual abiotic/biotic degradation of TCE in groundwater at a site in New Jersey.  Most of the contaminant mass is bound within a low permeability silt unit situated at a depth of approximately 20 feet.  Aqueous TCE concentrations of up to 230 mg/L were present within the silt unit whereas concentrations in the overlying more permeable sandy unit were two orders of magnitude lower.  Prior to the injection of the amendments ORP and DO levels indicated aerobic conditions, there was little to no evidence that biodegradation was occurring and low pH levels were likely inhibiting microbial activity.   

The nZVI and emulsified oil were injected into three injection points which targeted the silt unit.  Pneumatic and hydraulic fracturing techniques were used to enhance the distribution of the amendments.  Within days after the injections, ORP and DO levels dropped significantly to levels as low as -500 mV and indicated anoxic conditions in the range of sulfate reduction to methanogenesis had been achieved.  In addition, pH levels had increased to near neutral.  

Six months after the injection ORP levels were still below -100 mV and continue to decrease downgradient of the pilot study area, and DO levels are still anoxic.  Post-injection VOC data showed a significant drop in TCE concentrations in the injection area deep well (MW-17D) from 241 mg/L to 13 mg/L by month six.  Concentrations of c-DCE increased from ND to 450 mg/L in MW-17D indicating the near complete transition of TCE to c-DCE had occurred at that location by month six.  

Post-injection TCE concentrations increased significantly in the sand unit (from 1.4 mg/L to 220 mg/L by month two) indicating that the fracturing techniques and/or the surfactant properties of the oil emulsion had mobilized TCE mass from the silt unit.  An electrical imaging (EI) survey and molar concentration trends confirmed that TCE mass had been mobilized.  However, by month six, TCE concentrations had dropped significantly to 0.12 mg/L.  Concentrations of c-DCE and ethene increased appreciably indicating the complete dechlorination of the mobilized TCE mass is taking place. 

Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) and microscopic counts of Firmicutes (suspected fermenting bacteria), Deltaproteobacteria and Dehalococcoides ethenogenes (D. ethenogenes) indicated that an anaerobic consortium capable of microbial dechlorination of TCE developed in response to the nZVI-oil injections.  Total cell counts (DAPI staining) indicated that microbial populations increased by one to two orders of magnitude in the treatment zone groundwater after the injections.  After the initial increase, D. ethenogenes counts were seen to decrease in months three through six of the study.  The decrease in D. ethenogenes counts combined with an increase in CO2 and methane concentrations could indicate that anaerobic oxidation of VC and c-DCE may be occurring. 

Impact of Crude Oil Bioremediation in Soil on Groundwater Quality

James L. Brown, Lockheed Martin/REAC, 2890 Woodbridge Avenue, Edison, NJ 08837, Tel: 732-494-4060, Fax: 732-404-4021, Email: james.l.brown@lmco.com
Harry Allen, U.S. EPA/ERT, 2890 Woodbridge Avenue, Edison, NJ 08837, Tel: 732-321-6747  Email: allen.harry@epa.gov  

Crude oil-contaminated soil in oil well fields of western NY is currently being treated in on-site bioremediation treatment cells.  The goal is to develop simple, effective, low-cost bioremediation methods suitable for use by small, independent oil producers in NY and PA.  Guidelines for treating spilled crude oil in soil must address the potential for groundwater contamination.  A laboratory study was conducted to simulate construction and operation of a bioremediation treatment cell immediately after an inland crude oil spill.  The study represents a worst-case scenario for adverse groundwater impacts during treatment.  The simulation included mixing TPH-soil with bulking agents prior to treatment.  Thereafter, soil was undisturbed.  Soil for the study was obtained from an Allegany, NY bioremediation treatment cell where treatment was complete.  Treated soil from the site contained less than 1% total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs), and non-detectable levels of 4-6 ring polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).  This soil was spiked with 1%, 2%, 3%, 4% and 5% fresh crude oil.  Results from these treatments were compared to results from the unspiked control.  Soil was fertilized and limed in accordance with current EPA/REAC draft guidelines for bioremediation treatment cells.  After spiking with crude oil, soil was lightly mixed eight times over two days.  Each mixing event required less than one minute.  Between mixing events, soil was placed in test columns and tamped down to a bulk density of 1.0 g/cc.  Fifteen cm of this soil was placed over 40 cm of sand in glass cylinders 55 cm in height, with an inside diameter of 7.5 cm.  Columns contained permeable, fritted glass bottoms with built-in funnels for leachate collection.

Soil remained static during the study.  Test columns were seeded with a mixture of four TPH-tolerant grasses: annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum), perennial ryegrass (L. perenne), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea), and oats (Avena sativa).  The study duration was 16 weeks.  Leachate was sampled  after 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 weeks.  A special sampling device was used to prevent loss of volatile compounds during sampling.  Samples were analyzed for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX).  The highest BTEX concentrations in leachate were recorded, and compared to permissible concentrations under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. Benzene was of greatest concern due to its 5 Fg/L drinking water standard. 

Benzene was present at 582 mg/L in crude oil used for this test.  When soil was mixed to simulate addition of bulking agents, benzene volatilized completely.  Therefore, benzene was not detectable in any leachate samples.  Toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes did remain in soil after mixing.  These compounds were present in leachate, but at concentrations well below federal drinking water standards.  Results of this study indicate there may be no adverse impact to groundwater during bioremediation of freshly spilled crude oil in soils of NY and PA.

Combined Use of EHCTM plus KB-1TM Dehalococcoides Inoculant for Accelerated ISCR – First Full-Scale Field Application in Ohio, USA

Josephine Molin, Environmental Engineer, Adventus Americas, Inc., 2871 W. Forest Road, Suite 2, Freeport, IL 61032, Tel: 815-235-3503, Fax: 815-235-3506, Email: jmolin@adventus.us
Jim Mueller, Director of Remedial Solutions & Strategies, Adventus Americas, Inc., 2871 W. Forest Road, Suite 2, Freeport, IL 61032 Tel: 815-235-3503, Fax: 815-235-3506, Email: jmueller@adventus.us
Robin Corzatt, Project Manager, Hull & Associates, Inc., 6397 Emerald Parkway, Suite 200, Dublin, OH 43016, Tel: 614-793-8777, Fax: 614-793-9070, Email: rcorzatt@hullinc.com
James W. Smith, P.E., Senior Project Manager, T H Agriculture & Nutrition, L.L.C. 15313 West 95th Street, Lenexa, KS 66219, Tel: 913-888-2922, Email: JSmith8211@aol.com

Groundwater at a former manufacturing facility in Ohio is impacted by TCE (370 to 750 ug/L; remedial objective = 5 ug/L) and its recognized anaerobic daughter products 1,2-DCE (2,800 to 5,200 ug/L; remedial objective = 70 ug/L) and VC (390 to 510 ug/L; remedial objective = 2 ug/L). Groundwater collection trenches totaling over 330 ft in length were previously constructed downgradient of the suspected source areas. The trenches measure about 2 ft wide and are filled with washed river gravel from about 5 to 12 ft bgs. The groundwater table is generally at 6 ft bgs. EHCTM was injected into the gravel zone to convert the existing trenches into in situ permeable reactive barriers (PRB) that would treat the groundwater as it flows through the reactive zones. In February 2006, a total of 11,850 lbs of EHC was injected into a total 30 injection points strategically located about 10 ft off-center throughout the existing trenches. Each injection point received about 400 lbs of EHC delivered as 170 to 230 USG of slurry containing between 19 to 25% solids, resulting in an EHC application rate of 2.7 to 5.3% to soil mass within the trenches.

Immediately, following the EHC injections, KB-1TM Dehalococcoides inoculum (SiREM) was added to better ensure fast removal of cis-DCE. Approximately 800 ml of concentrated cell KB-1 inoculant was injected close to each of 26 EHC injection points within two depth intervals of the trenches. The KB-1 injections employed a Geoprobe® and a drop-hose (PEtubing).  Argonne gas was used to pressurize the system and the volume injected was measured using a “syringe-type system”.

Details of the EHC and KB-1 injection processes will be presented along with remedial performance and cost data associated with the remedial strategy.

Bioremediation of Hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) and 1,3,5,7-tetranitroperhydro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX)-Contaminated Sediments

Student Presenter

Man Jae Kwon, University of Illinois - Urbana Champaign, Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering, NCEL 205 N. Mathews, Urbana, IL, 61801, Tel: 217-333-6851, Fax: 217-333-6967, Email: mankwon@uiuc.edu
Kevin T. Finneran, University of Illinois - Urbana Champaign, Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering, NCEL 205 N. Mathews, Urbana, IL, 61801, Tel: 217-333-1514, Fax: 217-333-6967, Email: finneran@uiuc.edu

The explosives RDX and HMX are significant contaminants in soil and groundwater at DoD facilities. Adsorbed mass continuously leaches into groundwater and migrates to distal areas.  This study investigated electron shuttling mediated-biodegradation of RDX and HMX from two environments.

Batch experiments were performed with RDX-contaminated aquifer sediment from Picatinny Arsenal, NJ and with shallow-depth sediment contaminated by both RDX and HMX from Joliet, IL. Several different electron acceptors/shuttles including humic substances (HS) and anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate (AQDS), an HS analog, were incubated with acetate as an electron donor.

In aquifer sediment catalytic concentrations of AQDS and HS stimulated RDX reduction; RDX was below detect in 20 and 45d with AQDS and HS, respectively; nitroso metabolites did not accumulate in these incubations. Acetate alone did not stimulate the same rate of RDX degradation; 58mM RDX decreased to only 45mM during the first 60d and the nitroso metabolites accumulated in the absence of electron shuttles. RDX was not reduced in sterilized or unamended sediment incubations.

In Joliet sediment RDX has been reduced by 20% within 45d in the presence of both acetate and HS, likely due to higher initial RDX concentration. The initial concentrations of RDX (150mg/kg) and HMX (28mg/kg) are higher than their water solubility (RDX: 40mg/l; HMX: 6mg/l). Therefore adsorbed mass may continuously partition into the aqueous phase until equilibrium. HMX has not been reduced, suggesting that HMX is more recalcitrant than RDX.

These results indicate that indigenous microorganisms in sediments can utilize electron shuttles to stimulate RDX/HMX biodegradation. This strategy will provide rapid and effective reduction of explosives in contaminated systems. Upcoming experiments will include DNA quantification using real-time PCR and total microbial community analysis using amplified rDNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) to identify the dominant microorganisms associated with HS-mediated RDX/HMX biotransformation.

Bioremediation of Soil Contaminated with Organolead Compounds - Laboratory and Field Studies

C. Gallert, PD Dr. rer. nat. habil., Dept. Biology for Engineers and Biotechnology of Wastewater, University Karlsruhe, Am Fasanengarten, 76128 Karlsruhe, Tel: 0721-6083274, Email: Claudia.Gallert@iba.uka.de
J. Winter, Prof. Dr. rer. nat. habil., Dept.
Biology for Engineers and Biotechnology of Wastewater, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universität Karlsruhe, Am Fasanengarten, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Tel: 0721-6082297, Fax: 0721- 694826, Email: Josef.Winter@iba.uka.de

Tetraethyllead (TEL) and tetramethyllead (TML) were produced world-wide as anti-knocking additives for gasoline to increase octane numbers, causing an ubiquiteous pollution with tetraalkyllead (TAL) compounds and derivatives. For gasoline production in 1970 in the United States of America 279000 metric tons of organolead were comsumed. Another 326000 metric tons of organolead compounds were added worldwide to improve the burning quality of gasoline. Since the 1980´s the TAL in gasoline was replaced by methyl-tertiary-butylether (MTBE). In future the MTBE in unleaded gasoline presumably may be replaced by ethanol.

Whereas an ubiquiteous distribution of low concentrations of organolead compounds and of much higher amounts of inorganic lead was caused by car exhaustive gases in the upper layers of soil, spillages of highly toxic tetraalkyllead (TAL) compounds during production, transportation or blending at oil refineries and petrol stations caused more severe soil and groundwater contaminations.

In Germany TEL and TML were manufactured by two chemical factories until the end of the 1980´s. At both production sites significant amounts of organolead compounds were spilled and drained into the underground and still endanger the aquifer. The subsurface soil contains mainly fluvial sand deposits with a hydraulic conductivity of 3.5 x 10-4 m s-1. On average, groundwater saturation starts about 3 m below the ground level and the groundwater flow is about 70 m.year-1. Little oxygen is found in the groundwater upstream and no oxygen in the groundwater downstream of the industrial site.

Spillage of tetraethyl lead (TEL) and tetramethyl lead (TML) caused severe soil and groundwater contaminations at all TEL manufacturing sites and at gasoline distribution stations not only in Germany, but also in other gasoline producing countries (e.g. in Italy, etc.). During the regular production process volatile alkyl lead compounds were absorbed from the off-gas of TEL or TML production sites by the use of heavy-boiling oil fractions (hydrocarbons). The oily TEL or TML concentrates or TEL-/TML-containing production fluids were apparently spilled by inaccurate handling and migrated into the underground.

The nonionic TEL is stable in heavy oil phases but is unstable in moist soil and, once it is dispersed in the water phase, is subjected to chemical and/or biological dealkylation reactions. The first dealkylation products are very stable ionic, water soluble tri- and dialkyl lead compounds, which are motile in the water-saturated zone and cause a severe groundwater problem. The conversion of organolead compounds by degradation of the alkyl moieties into inorganic, less toxic lead (succeded by immobilisation of the Pb-ions to PbCO3 or Pb5PO4Cl) reduces the environmental risk.

Suitable conditions for chemical and microbiological transformation of alkyl lead to inorganic lead may allow in situ remediation of contaminated sites. Microbiological dealkylation of organolead compounds was reported in laboratory and field studies. However, the biological oxidation required an electron acceptor such as oxygen.

In a laboratory study, 10-L glass columns were filled with TEL contaminated soil (~ 300 mg TEL/kg soil and ~ 530 mg oil hydrocarbons/kg soil) from a TEL/TML-manufactoring site and dealkylation activity was monitored. In each of three parallel columns oxygen-saturated water (ca. 30 mg O2/L; saturation with pure oxygen) or oxygen-saturated water plus a mineral mix to supply essential minerals for the microorganims was circulated to improve the conditions for the autochthonic soil microflora. At a pumping rate of 2.2 l per day and a retention time of the water/mineral mix in the columns of 1.4 days oxygen limitation was prevented. The formation and degradation of the tri- and dialkylated species in the circulating water was observed with time. Measurement of oxygen levels in the water leaving the columns with mineral addition revealed a much lower residual oxygen concentration of 2.8 – 3.6 mg/l compared to the leachate of the columns with just water circulation (13.4 mg/l). This indicated an accelerated respriation activity and therefore an enhanced microbial activity in the nutrient-enriched soil environment.

The soil columns were run more than two years at different alkyllead concentrations. Most of the tetra- and trialkyllead was chemically converted and microbiologically degraded to inorganic lead precipitates, carbon dioxide and water. A significant viable population of microorganisms was found in the columns desipte of the alkyllead toxicity and the poor supply with nutrients and a suitable carbon source even after 3 years. 

At the contaminated site, the groundwater was enriched with oxygen by air injection through air-injection wells. Air injection caused a groundwater circulation and the oxygen-enriched groundwater led to a degradation of the TEL/TML-contaminants.

For final sanitation of the alkyllead-contaminated site, the hot spot of the contamination was excavated and thermally purified. The heated soil was refilled in order to reduce the time requirement for biological sanitation. The residual groundwater pollution downstream of the polluted site was treated by pumping out the groundwater through groundwater wells at the end of the industrial area, oxygen-treatment of the groundwater that contained still low levels of tri- and di-alkyllead compounds in a special basin and re-infiltration at the upstream end of the area for final microbial purification in the soil . 

Anaerobic Bioremediation Results Lead to Alternative Cleanup Levels for Chloroethene Contaminated Groundwater at Connecticut Site

Michael E. Miller, CDM, 50 Hampshire Street, Cambridge, MA, 02139, Tel: 617-452-6295, Fax: 617-452-8295, Email: millerme@cdm.com
Kevin P. Molloy, CDM, 50 Hampshire Street, Cambridge, MA, 02139, Tel: 617-452-6328, Fax: 617-452-8328, Email: molloykp@cdm.com
William K. Glynn, CDM, 50 Hampshire Street, Cambridge, MA, 02139, Tel: 617-452-6280, Fax: 617-452-8280, Email: glynnwk@cdm.com

Trichloroethene (TCE) in the groundwater beneath a manufacturing facility in Connecticut is being treated utilizing a combined system of in situ enhanced anaerobic bioremediation (EAB) and groundwater control with the old pump and treat system.  EAB was initiated by injection of sodium lactate (carbon source) into the upgradient third of the contaminant plume.  Simultaneously, groundwater control was maintained with an extraction well located at the downgradient property boundary, with tray aerator and activated carbon treatment. Horizontal wells from the old pump and treat system were also utilized to enhance delivery of the carbon source.  At the start of biostimulation, TCE concentrations ranged from 5,000 ug/L to 20,000 ug/L.  Within one year, more than 50% of the TCE was transformed into cis-1,2-dichloroethene and vinyl chloride, while final daughter product ethene concentrations reached as high as 700 ug/L.  The pilot test results indicated that the treatment time could be reduced by over 20 years and save up to $600,000, in comparison to continued operation of the original groundwater pump and treat system. Similar application of EAB to the remainder of the plume is planned.

A conceptual site groundwater model was constructed to predict chloroethene concentrations at multiple monitoring locations throughout the remediation process.  The model and the EAB results were used to negotiate with the state regulatory agency a series of cleanup standards for the following sequential stages in groundwater cleanup: (1) termination of groundwater pumping, (2) ending active bioremediation, and (3) conducting monitored natural attenuation (MNA).  The integration of the remaining components of the old pump and treat system and the EAB process was effective in maintaining regulatory compliance, while expediting source area treatment with a defined regulatory closure goal. The bioremediation system design and results will be described, as will the groundwater model, the negotiated cleanup goals and cost/benefit analysis.

Top
   

Past Conference Programs | Home
  
 
  
Design and Hosting by Dot.Inc Group
Copyright © 2000 University of Massachusetts - All rights reserved.