How
Low do you Want to Go? In-Situ Thermal Desorption
Consistently Achieves Low Cleanup Standards
Ralph S. Baker, TerraTherm, Inc., Fitchburg, MA
Design
and Performance Evaluation of Air Sparging Trench for the
Treatment of VOCs and Arsenic
Omer J. Uppal, Xpert Design and Diagnostics, LLC,
Stratham, NH
Electrochemical
Generated Alkaline Barrier for In-situ Treatment of
Hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) Contaminated
Groundwater
David B. Gent, US Army Engineer Research and
Development Center, Vicksburg, MS
Chlorinated
Soils Remediation Using Steam Injection Into Fractured
Bedrock
Ian T. Osgerby, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New
England, Concord, MA
Treatment
of Trichloroethene with Reactive Nanoscale Iron Particles
Andreas D. Jazdanian, Toda America, Inc., Schaumburg,
IL
Use
of High Concentration Magnesium Sulfate Solution to
Remediate Petroleum Impacted Groundwater
James F. Cuthbertson, Delta Environmental Consultants,
Inc., Novi, MI
Completion
of In-Situ Thermal Remediation of PAHs PCP and Dioxins at
a Former Wood Treatment Facility
John Bierschenk, TerraTherm, Inc., Fitchburg, MA
How
Low do you Want to Go?
In-Situ Thermal Desorption Consistently Achieves
Low Cleanup Standards
Ralph
S. Baker,
TerraTherm, Inc., 356 Broad Street, Fitchburg, MA 01420,
Tel: 978-343-0300, Fax: 978-343-2727, Email: rbaker@terratherm.com
Gorm Heron, TerraTherm, Inc., 28900 Indian Point, Keene,
CA 93531,
Tel. and Fax: (661) 823-1620, Email: gheron@terratherm.com
John C. LaChance, TerraTherm, Inc., 356 Broad Street,
Fitchburg, MA 01420, Tel: 978-343-0300, Fax: 978-343-2727,
Email: jlachance@terratherm.com
John M. Bierschenk, TerraTherm, Inc., 356 Broad Street,
Fitchburg, MA 01420, Tel: 978-343-0300, Fax: 978-343-2727,
Email: jbierschenk@terratherm.com
Establishing
cleanup standards for contaminated source areas has long
been a balance between what is considered technically
feasible and what is mandated.
With respect to dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL)
source zones in soil and groundwater, a school of thought
has become prevalent that assumes that volatile and
semivolatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs) of concern
cannot feasibly be treated in
situ to concentrations low enough to be consistent
with meeting Maximum Concentration Limits (MCLs) in
groundwater. This
position has been most strongly held when it comes to
DNAPL in challenging subsurface settings such as
heterogeneous and fractured media.
Now,
as a result of over fifteen completed source area
remediation projects using In-Situ Thermal Desorption (ISTD),
which combines Thermal Conduction Heating (TCH) and vacuum
extraction, a new paradigm for source treatment is
emerging. Because
TCH takes advantage of the invariance of thermal
conductivity across a wide range of soil types, no
targeted area is left unheated.
ISTD therefore is able to accomplish complete and
rapid treatment of DNAPL in lower-permeability and
heterogeneous formations.
This presentation will review results from TCH
projects treating both VOCs such as chlorinated solvents
and SVOCs including PCBs, PAHs and dioxins, which have
consistently met the very low cleanup standards that have
been set. These
projects have often been implemented under performance
guarantee type contracts, reducing the site owners’
risk. Recent
examples include seven chlorinated solvent DNAPL source
areas treated to mean concentrations <50 ug/kg of TCE
and PCE, and eight SVOC source areas treated to similarly
low concentrations of PAHs and PCBs.
At a recent Brownfield site treated by ISTD, the
enhanced property value that the owner derived through
meeting residential cleanup standards was far greater than
their remediation cost.
Design
and Performance Evaluation of Air Sparging Trench for the
Treatment of VOCs and Arsenic
Omer
J. Uppal,
Xpert Design and Diagnostics, LLC, 22 Marin Way, Stratham,
NH 03885, Tel: 603-778-1100, Fax: 603-778-2121, Email: Uppal@xdd-llc.com
Michael C. Marley, Xpert Design and Diagnostics, LLC, 22
Marin Way, Stratham, NH 03885, Tel: 603-778-1100, Fax:
603-778-2121, Email: Marley@xdd-llc.com
Dennis Keane, Xpert Design and Diagnostics, LLC, 22 Marin
Way, Stratham, NH 03885, Tel: 603-778-1100, Fax:
603-778-2121, Email: Keane@xdd-llc.com
Dean Peschel, Project Manager, City of Dover, 288 Central
Avenue, Dover, NH 03820,
Tel:
603-743-6094, Fax: 603-742-3019, Email: dean.peschel@ci.dover.nh.us
An air sparging trench
alternative was compared to a capping/pump and treat
remedy for groundwater impacted with volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and arsenic constituents of concern (COCs),
as specified in a Record of Decision (ROD) at a United
States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA)
landfill site. The air sparging trench with an
engineered backfill material was designed to intercept and
treat COCs migrating with groundwater from beneath the
landfill. The design and performance evaluation of the
trench are presented.
The trench was designed to
provide in-situ flow-through treatment of VOCs by a combination of
volatilization and aerobic biodegradation, and arsenic by
precipitation and sorption. Various laboratory and
field-scale tests were performed to evaluate the
effectiveness of the trench in removing COCs. The results
of laboratory, field-scale testing, and a stripping
analysis indicated that the trench could remove the
majority of VOCs that are present at the site by air
sparging. Organic compounds that are not expected to be
completely volatilized were projected to degrade by
aerobic microorganisms in the oxygenated groundwater
within and down-gradient of the trench.
Geochemical modeling was
performed to evaluate the ability of oxidizing conditions
within trench to remove dissolved arsenic from groundwater
through co-precipitation and sorption onto iron oxides.
The modeling results indicated that oxidizing conditions
created in the trench will result in precipitation of
dissolved arsenic and other reduced minerals into the void
spaces of the trench backfill material, significantly
reducing the dissolved arsenic levels down-gradient of the
trench.
Long-term performance
issues (i.e., mineral precipitation and biofouling)
observed at other air sparging trenches were evaluated and
solutions for such potential issues were incorporated in
the design. The
air sparging trench alternative evaluation resulted in an
amendment of the original ROD with a substantial cost
saving to the client.
Electrochemical
Generated Alkaline Barrier for In-situ Treatment of
Hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5 triazine (RDX) Contaminated
Groundwater
David
B. Gent,
Environmental Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and
Development Center, 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS
39180, Tel: 1-601-634-4822, Fax: 1-601-634-3518, Email: David.B.Gent@erdc.usace.amry.mil
Altaf H. Wani, Applied Research Associates, Inc., 119
Monument Place, Vicksburg, MS 39180
, Tel:
601 634 4820, Fax: 601-634-3518, Email:
Altaf.H.Wani@erdc.usace.army.mil
Akram Alshawabkeh, Associate Professor Department of Civil
and Environmental Engineering, 400 Snell Engineering
Center, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue,
Boston, MA 02115, Tel: 617-373-3994, 617-373-4419, Email:
aalsha@neu.edu
Jeffrey L. Davis, Environmental Laboratory, US Army
Engineer Research and Development Center, 3909 Halls Ferry
Road, Vicksburg, MS 39180, Tel: 601-634-4822, Fax:
601-634-3518, Email: Jeffery.L.Davis@erdc.usace.amry.mil
The
use, manufacturing, and storage of nitroaromatic and
nitramine explosive compounds resulted in contamination of
soil and groundwater.
The U.S. EPA lists
hexahydro,1-3-5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) under the
Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation for the
Public in List 2. RDX groundwater contamination causes disruptions in the use
of military training areas and impacts local drinking
water supplies resulting in additional costs in long term
groundwater monitoring and remediation.
Sand
packed columns in a horizontal flow arrangement were used
in laboratory experiments to simulate an in-situ
electrochemical barrier.
The simulated barrier was used to destroy the RDX
at the cathode and eliminate its downstream migration.
Mixed metal oxide coated titanium electrodes (anode
and cathode) were installed in slotted PVC wells within
the column to facilitate the direct and indirect
destruction of RDX contaminated water by electrolysis and
alkaline hydrolysis, respectively. Over the range of inlet concentrations (0.5 to 25 mg/L), RDX
removal was approximately 95% with 75% RDX destruction
near the cathode, presumably by electrolysis and 13% RDX
destruction downstream of the cathode by alkaline
hydrolysis with applied current densities of 8 to16 A/m2.
Nitroso-substituted products (MNX, DNX, and TNX)
were below detection limits in the column effluent.
The effluent end products of RDX ring cleavage
detected were formate, nitrite, and nitrate. This study highlights the destructive potential of
electrochemical processes for in-situ remediation of RDX
contaminated water. The
significance of this 3rd generation remediation
technology is that the contaminant can be removed from the
groundwater without chemical additions to the subsurface.
Chlorinated
Soils Remediation Using Steam Injection Into Fractured
Bedrock
Ian
T. Osgerby,
Ph.D, P.E, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, New England, 696 Virginia Road,
Concord, MA 01742, Tel:
978-318-8631, Fax: 978-318-8614, Email:
ian.t.osgerby@usace.army.mil
Jim
Shulz CPG, EA
Engineering, Sci. & Tech., 333 Turnpike Road,
Southborough, MA 01772
Greg Crisp, Crisp
Environmental Services, 1059 Vernal Ave., Merced, CA 95340
Ken
Manchester and Steve Antonioli, SME,
MSE Technology Applications, Inc., 200 Technology Way,
P.O. Box 4078, Butte, MT 59702
The
former PR-58 Nike Missile battery Site was constructed in
1955/1956. It
included a missile assembly
and test building with an underground storage tank
(UST), a generator building with a 4000-gal UST and
personnel quarters, and was equipped with short range,
conventionally-armed Nike Ajaz missiles. The facility was deactivated in 1962. The Army drilled holes in the bottom of the silos, backfilled
them with clean sand and demolished the concrete
structures surrounding the silos.
There is no site-specific documentation regarding
use, storage or disposal of hazardous materials, however,
a variety of chlorinated organic solvents (CVOCs) such as
carbon tetrachloride (CT), tetrachloro- ethane/ethenes (PCA/PCE)and
trichloro-ethane/ethenes (TCE/TCE) were typically used for
parts cleaning, degreasing and preparation cleaning for
painting. Typical quantities used ranged from 30 to 120
liters/month of TCE and 190 to 380 liters/month for other
solvents. The
site geological units have been classified into three
hydrogeological zones, an upper shallow overburden
(typically glacio-fluvial sand), a deep overburden
groundwater zone (sandy silty gravel to sandy gravelly
silt – possibly till and a weathered bedrock zone), and
a competent bedrock groundwater zone (upper 60 feet of
competent bedrock). The
deep and rock units are considered as a single
heterogeneous groundwater zone and all three are in
hydraulic communication.
Contamination in these units is sporadic with the
deep zone being the most contaminated.
Total CVOCs range from 383,700 ug/L in MW03-14D and
118,148 ug/l 80 feet west at EA-102, and non detect to the
west, southwest and north.
The highest total CVOC concentration of 20,911 ug/L
in the shallow competent bedrock was found in MW-03-14R.
A steam enhanced remediation (SER) pilot test was
undertaken to determine whether the CVOCs could be
remediated by injection of steam and air and utilizing a
dual phase vacuum extraction system.
Steam (about 1550 lbs/hr) was injected in 4 well
locations with a central extraction and 6 surrounding
(pneumatic control) triple well clusters screened across
the 3 zones. This injection/extraction system was centered inside a ring
of perimeter wells to allow monitoring of potential
impacts from thermal mobilization of the CVOCs.
The project was delayed until the unusually high
water table fell to the mid screen of the upper shallow
zone and the injection system was then operated for 8
weeks. Several
hundred pounds of CVOCs were extracted despite
difficulties introducing steam into the series of micro
fractures in the weathered and competent bedrock. Subsurface temperatures were monitored throughout the
project.
Treatment
of Trichloroethene with Reactive Nanoscale Iron Particles
Andreas
D. Jazdanian,
Toda America Inc., 1920 N. Thoreau Dr., Suite 110,
Schaumburg, IL 60173, Tel.: 847-397-7060, Fax847-3977318,
Email: andy@todaamerica.com
M. Amine Dahmani, Spectrum Analytical, Inc.,
11 Almgren Drive, Agawam, MA 01001, Tel.: 800-789-9115, Fax: 413-789-4076, Email: adahmani@spectrum-analytical.com
Kenji Okinaka, Toda Kogyo Corporation, 1-1-1 Shinoki,
Sanyoonoda, Yamaguchi, 756-0847, Japan, Tel: +
0836-89-0007, Fax: + 0836-88-3737, Email: Kenji_Okinaka@todakogyo.co.jp
Michael
E. Miller, Camp
Dresser & McKee, Inc.,
50 Hampshire Street, Cambridge, MA 02139, Tel.:
617-452-6295, Fax: 617-452-8295,
Email: millerme@cdm.com
The
treatment of trichloroethene (TCE) impacted groundwater
with laboratory grade metallic and bimetallic nanoscale
materials has received considerable attention. In this
work, reactive nanoscale iron particles (RNIP) that are
produced in bulk (200 to 400 metric tons per year)
were used for the degradation of dissolved phase TCE. The
25 % nanoiron slurry used in this study was produced
by Toda Kogyo Corporation, Japan. RNIP consist of an
elemental iron core (α-Fe) and a magnetite shell (Fe3O4).
RNIP also contained unidentified sulfur compounds
determined as sulfur in concentrations of about 4,000 mg/kg.
The average particle size was about
70 nm,
and the average surface area was
about 29 m2/g.
TCE degradation was studied as a function of RNIP and TCE
concentration, and for different solution alkalinities and
ionic strengths. The investigated initial TCE
concentrations were representative of ground water source
area contamination and ranged from 34 to 340 mg/L.
The three different solutions used in this study consisted
of deionized water, a solution with about 100 mg/L
alkalinity and total ionic strength of 0.05 M, and a
solution with about 400 mg/l alkalinity and total
ionic strength of 0.1 M. The resulting total
dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations of the batch tests
were calculated to be about 2,440 to 5,027 mg/L. The
investigated RNIP concentrations ranged from 1 to 8.3 g/L
(total surface area of 0.86 to 7.17 m2).
For static tests, overall TCE
mass reductions (sum of gaseous and aqueous phase) of more
than 99 % for 1 g/L RNIP and more than 99.8 %
for 4.2 g/L RNIP were observed. The production
of degradation products was not proportional to the TCE
dechlorination. Ionic strength did not affect the
degradation rate. However, the acidity resulting from the
dechlorination consumed the alkalinity and diminished
degradation rates.
Use
of High Concentration Magnesium Sulfate Solution to
Remediate Petroleum Impacted Groundwater
James
F. Cuthbertson,
P.E., Delta Environmental Consultants, Inc., 39810 Grand
River Avenue, Suite C-100, Novi, Michigan, 48375, Tel:
248-699-0259, Fax: 248-699-0232, Email: jcuthbertson@deltaenv.com
Jeffrey A. Kaestner, P.E., Delta Environmental
Consultants, Inc., 6330 East 75th Street, Suite
176, Indianapolis, Indiana 46250, Tel: 314-422-6251,
Email: jkaestner@deltaenv.com
Lyle G. Bruce, PhD, BP Products North America Inc. –
Remediation Environmental Technology, 28100 Torch Parkway,
Warrenville, Illinois 60555, Tel: 630-836-7174, Email:
lyle.bruce@bp.com
Anaerobic
degradation is the dominant driving force in natural
attenuation of petroleum contamination in the subsurface.
The contribution to natural attenuation by electron
acceptors other than oxygen, such as nitrate, iron III,
manganese IV, sulfate, and even carbon dioxide, has been
the subject of considerable research in recent years.
Kolhatkar et al. (2000), Wiedemeier et al. (1999),
and Wilson et al. (2002) have shown that of these natural
anaerobic processes, sulfate reduction accounts for most
of the degradation The
use of these alternative electron acceptors has been shown
to have many potential advantages over the traditional
approach of attempting to add dissolved oxygen to the
plume. The
case studies presented will demonstrate the benefits of
using high concentrations of Magnesium Sulfate solution
(>10,000 mg/l) to stimulate the biodegradation of
petroleum contaminants in groundwater under field
conditions at various sites. Many of these sites have had other technologies applied prior
to applications. Graphics
depicting the historical concentrations and reduction
trends will be provided.
In addition to the relatively rapid degradation of
petroleum compounds such as BTEX, this technology is quite
cost effective in comparison to other currently available
remediation techniques.
A description of the technology, site selection
criteria, dosage determination, and field scale
performance results demonstrating contaminant
concentration reductions in groundwater of more than 90%
within a few months at some sites will be presented.
Magnesium Sulfate was selected for use due to
availability, low cost, high solubility and the relative
safety associated with handling.
This technology has advantages over others for many
sites where physical limitations (buildings, utilities,
etc.) preclude other technologies.
Completion
of In-Situ Thermal Remediation of PAHs, PCP and Dioxins at
a Former Wood Treatment Facility
John
M. Bierschenk,
TerraTherm, Inc., 356 Broad Street, Fitchburg, MA 01420,
Tel: 978-343-0300, Fax: 978-343-2727, Email: jbierschenk@terratherm.com
Ralph S. Baker, TerraTherm, Inc., 356 Broad Street,
Fitchburg, MA 01420, Tel: 978-343-0300, Fax: 978-343-2727,
Email: rbaker@terratherm.com
James
P. Galligan, TerraTherm, Inc., 356 Broad Street,
Fitchburg, MA 01420, Tel: 978-343-0300, Fax: 978-343-2727, Email: jgalligan@terratherm.com
Ronald Young, TerraTherm, Inc., 356 Broad Street,
Fitchburg, MA 01420, Tel:
978-343-0300, Fax: 978-343-2727, Email: ryoung@terratherm.com
The
largest in situ thermal conduction heating project ever
undertaken at a wood treatment site was completed in March
2006. The
site was a former utility pole treatment facility that
Southern California Edison (SCE) operated from 1921 to
1957.
The
subsurface soils were contaminated primarily with
polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), pentachlorophenol (PCP),
dioxins and furans, with soil treatment standards of 0.065
mg/kg benzo(a)pyrene Toxic Equivalents, 25 mg/kg PCP, and
1.0 mg/kg
dioxin, expressed as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (TCDD)
Toxic Equivalents (TEQ).
A feasibility study led to the selection of
TerraTherm’s patented In-Situ Thermal Destruction (ISTD)
technology, which utilizes simultaneous application of
thermal conduction heating and vacuum to treat
contaminated soil without excavation.
The applied heat volatilizes organic contaminants
within the soil, enabling them to be carried in the vapor
stream toward heater-vacuum wells.
Subsurface temperature monitoring tracked the
progress of heating.
A heating goal for inter-well temperatures of 325°C
(620°F)
was achieved, as were all the soil treatment standards and
air emission standards.
Approx.
16,500 CY of predominantly silty soil was treated to a
maximum depth of 105 ft. TerraTherm installed 785 thermal
wells, including 654 heater-only and 131 heater-vacuum
wells, in a hexagonal pattern at 7.0-foot spacing.
Final
data results will be presented, including a comparison of
pre- and post-treatment soil sampling, quantity of
contaminants treated, and energy and material balances.
Treatment mechanisms will be discussed, along with
specific lessons learned and project costs.
Top
|