Using
Field Pilot-Testing Results to Design a Full-Scale
Enhanced Bioremediation Approach to Remediate DNAPL TCE
Lucas A. Hellerich, Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.,
Wallingford, CT
Use
of Degradable Non-oxidizing Biocides and Biodispersants
for Maintenance of Capacity in Nutrient Injection Wells
Brad Horn, Redux Technology, Newfane, VT
Mechanisms
and Kinetics of Extracellular Electron Shuttle Mediated
Cyclic Nitramine (RDX and HMX) Biodegradation
Man Jae Kwon, University of Illinois - Urbana
Champaign, Urbana, IL
Influence
of Carbon Source on Microbial Community in Passive ARD
Treatment System
Jana Schmidtova, University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, BC
Replacement
of a Groundwater Extraction System with Bioremediation to
Treat Trichloroethylene in Fractured Bedrock
Douglas G. Larson, Geosyntec Consultants, Inc., Acton,
MA
Transport
of Lactate and in-situ Bioremediation of
Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) under Direct Current
David B. Gent, US Army Engineer Research and
Development Center, Vicksburg, MS
Using
Field Pilot-Testing Results to Design a Full-Scale
Enhanced Bioremediation Approach to Remediate DNAPL TCE
Lucas A. Hellerich,
PhD, PE, Metcalf & Eddy /AECOM, 860 North Main Street
Extension, Wallingford, CT 06492, Tel: 203-741-2821, Fax:
203-269-8788, Email: lucas.hellerich@m-e.aecom.com
Paul Dombrowski, Metcalf & Eddy / AECOM,
701 Edgewater,
Wakefield
,
MA
01880
, Tel: 781-224-6585, Fax:
781-224-6542, Email: paulm.dombrowski@m-e.aecom.com
John L. Albrecht, LEP, Metcalf & Eddy / AECOM,
860 North Main Street Extension, Wallingford, CT 06492,
Tel: 203-741-2826, Fax: 203-269-8788, Email: john.albrecht@m-e.aecom.com
Dave Hart, Noranda Metals Industries, Inc.,
P.O. Box
70
, New
Madrid
,
MO
63869
, Tel: 573-643-6763, Fax:
573-643-6715, Email: DHart@xstrata.ca
Several field pilot studies
of enhanced bioremediation (reductive dechlorination) of
trichloroethene (TCE) were conducted at a site located in
western
Connecticut
. The
concentration of TCE in the groundwater plume varied
spatially, but was up to 768 mg/L (~ 70% solubility of TCE),
indicating the presence of dense-non-aqueous-phase-liquid.
At the source area and within the groundwater
plume, emulsified soybean oil, amended with a bromide
tracer, was injected into the subsurface, providing a
slow-release source of carbon and reducing power for the
naturally-occurring microbial populations.
Reducing conditions, characterized by negative
oxidation-reduction potential and decreased dissolved
oxygen levels, were achieved within several weeks of the
injection events. The
distribution of the carbon substrate was evaluated using
total organic carbon (TOC) and bromide concentrations. After
operating the pilot tests for several months,
bioaugmentation of dehalococcoides spp. bacteria was
performed at each of the test locations. Chlorinated
ethenes, TOC, geochemical parameters, and microbial
populations were monitored to determine the effectiveness
of the treatment.
The results of the pilot
tests were utilized to design a full-scale enhanced
bioremediation approach for the chlorinated solvent
groundwater plume. A
reaction and transport groundwater model was developed for
the site and used in the design of the bioremediation
approach. Biodegradation
reaction rates were estimated and incorporated into the
modeling. Injection
radii of influence, and carbon substrate composition,
quantities, and loading rates were determined.
In addition, required biodegradation geochemistry,
and carbon delivery locations, rates, and methods were
incorporated into the design.
The design also included a plan to monitor the
performance of the enhanced bioremediation approach.
Use
of Degradable Non-oxidizing Biocides and Biodispersants
for Maintenance of Capacity in Nutrient Injection Wells
Brad
Horn,
PE, Redux Technology, P.O. Box 331, Newfane, VT 05345,
Tel: 802-365-7200, Fax:
802-365-4652, Email: bhorn@reduxtech.com
Gary Richards, Redux Technology, 1317 Pennsridge Court,
Downingtown, PA 19335, Tel:
610-716-2561, Fax:
610-873-3967, Email:
grichards@reduxtech.com
Fouling
of water supply wells is a common problem, dating from the
time humans started using groundwater resources for water
supply. In the
groundwater remediation field, fouling of recovery and
treatment systems has been a similarly common operating
problem. Thus
it is not surprising, with the increased use of in-situ
remedial methods, that fouling of in-situ treatment units
is becoming a major design concern.
In-situ treatment units include recovery wells,
injection wells, recirculating wells, flow-through
treatment cells, and in some cases, geologic formations
themselves. The
very effectiveness of these units depends greatly upon
retention of permeability or hydraulic capacity.
Capacity can be dramatically reduced due to fouling
by naturally occurring inorganic precipitates or by
microbial deposits.
One
of the least surprising instances of fouling of an in-situ
treatment unit involves various bioenhancement techniques,
where nutrients are injected with the intention of
enhancing certain types of bioactivity and subsequent
biodegradation of contamination.
The data presented in this paper are derived from
experience at remedial sites where bioenhancement
activities have been self-defeating by causing a loss of
permeability in injection wells, surrounding geological
formations, or down-gradient recovery or recirculation
wells. In
these cases, non-oxidizing biocides, bio-dispersants,
saponification agents or other additives have been applied
to retain permeability in the hydraulic “bottlenecks”
of these systems, such as injection wells and surrounding
formations. Data
collected from such applications shows that proper
characterization of fouling mechanisms and subsequent
application of well-designed deposit control programs can
eliminate operational problems associated with fouling
arising from bioenhancement.
This
paper introduces the key concepts in deposit control
practices as they apply to fouling of in-situ treatment
units. It
provides an overview of the various agents and techniques
used in such deposit control programs.
Regulatory and design issues are discussed, and
subsequently illustrated by a series of brief case
studies.
Mechanisms
and Kinetics of Extracellular Electron Shuttle Mediated
Cyclic Nitramine (RDX and HMX) Biodegradation
Student
Presenter
Man
Jae Kwon,
University of Illinois - Urbana Champaign, Dept of Civil
and Environmental Engineering, NCEL 205 N. Mathews,
Urbana, IL, 61801, Tel: 217-333-6851, Fax: 217-333-6967,
Email: mankwon@uiuc.edu
Kevin T. Finneran, PhD, University of Illinois
- Urbana Champaign, Dept of Civil and Environmental
Engineering, NCEL 205 N. Mathews, Urbana, IL, 61801, Tel:
217-333-1514, Fax: 217-333-6967, Email: finneran@uiuc.edu
Microbial
enrichments were generated using RDX-contaminated aquifer
material that was incubated under a variety of
extracellular electron shuttle (EES)-amended conditions.
Electron donors tested included H2, benzoate, formate,
lactate, or acetate; electron acceptors included poorly
crystalline Fe(III) oxide, AQDS, or RDX. Enriched cultures
were sequentially transferred (10%) into new media
containing the same electron donors and acceptors.
AQDS
and Fe(III) reducing enrichments were developed with H2 or
acetate as the sole electron donors. Although the
enrichments have not reduced RDX directly, it is known
that reduced EES and Fe(II) can reduce RDX by abiotic
mechanisms. Lactate and RDX (15mM)
were used to develop specific RDX-reducing enrichments and
these microorganisms reduced RDX below the detection limit
within 7 days suggesting enriched microorganisms can
utilize RDX directly as the sole electron acceptor.
Microorganisms grown in a medium containing lactate and
RDX also grew with lactate and with quinone-based military
smoke dye as the sole electron acceptor. Additional
experiments with the resting cell suspensions of G.
metallireducens indicated that RDX reduction rate was 8
times faster with military smoke dye (12 mM),
suggesting that military smoke dye could be another
optimal source of EES and applicable to RDX remediation in
military areas. In
addition, RDX ring cleavage was fastest and most complete
in the presence of EES; approximately 70% of the available
RDX carbon was recovered as formaldehyde (a labile
compound) when EES were present versus 12% when the
cultures received only an electron donor.
These
results indicate that indigenous microorganisms in
sediments can utilize EES to stimulate RDX biodegradation.
EES-mediated RDX biodegradation is an effective
remediation option in various environmental settings.
Future study will identify the dominant microorganisms
associated with EES-mediated RDX biotransformation by DNA
quantification using real-time PCR and total microbial
community analysis using amplified rDNA restriction
analysis (ARDRA).
Influence
of Carbon Source on Microbial Community in Passive ARD
Treatment System
Student
Presenter
Jana Schmidtova,
Chemical
and Biological Engineering, University of British Columbia, 2360 East Mall,
Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3 Canada, Tel: 604-827-5760, Fax:
604-822-6003
Susan A. Baldwin, Chemical and Biological Engineering,
University of British Columbia,
2360 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3 Canada, Tel:
604-822-1973, Fax: 604-822-6003
Passive
anaerobic remediation using bacterial sulfate reduction is
a low-cost, effective, and long-term treatment option for
acid rock drainage. This approach was used by Nature Works
Remediation Corporation to build a six-stage treatment
wetland system for removal of arsenic, cadmium and zinc
from a waste pile leachate stream near Trail, British
Columbia. The leachate flows through two anaerobic
bioreactors filled with pulp mill biosolids as organic
material and then through three cattails plant cells and a wetland pond.
Over the five years of operation, the arsenic removal
efficiency remained above 96.6%. However, it is not known
how much carbon is left available for the microbial growth
in the system, thus the long-term successful treatment
cannot be predicted.
In this study, five different carbon sources: pulp mill biosolids, vegetable compost,
silage, molasses, and composted cattails were compared in
situ to
determine the influence of organic material on the sulfate
reducing bacteria (SRB)
community and on the long-term treatment efficiency.
Subsamples of the materials were removed from the system
after 3 and 5 months to evaluate the carbon degradation
kinetics. Rapid and reliable molecular techniques, such as
quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR) was
developed to specifically target and quantify SRB groups
present.
The results of this study will bring new information on the
relationship between carbon degradation and the microbial
community for different commonly used carbon materials.
This will potentially aid in design and choice of the most
suitable material for new passive treatment systems, as
well as estimate the time scale of efficient treatment for
existing systems.
Replacement
of a Groundwater Extraction System with Bioremediation to
Treat Trichloroethylene in Fractured Bedrock
Carl
R. Elder, Geosyntec Consultants, Inc., 289 Great Road,
Suite 105, Acton, MA 01720,
Tel: 978-263-9588, Fax: 978-263-9594, Email:
celder@geosyntec.com
Douglas
G. Larson,
Geosyntec Consultants, Inc., 289 Great Road, Suite 105,
Acton, MA 01720,
Tel: 978-263-9588, Fax: 978-263-9594, Email:
dlarson@geosyntec.com
John E. Vidumsky, DuPont Corporate Remediation Group,
Barley Mill Plaza 19 – 2164, 4417 Lancaster Pike,
Wilmington, DE 19805,
Tel: 302-892-1378, Fax: 302-892-7621, Email:
John.E.Vidumsky@usa.dupont.com
Bioremediation
was used to replace a 15-year old groundwater extraction
and treatment system that had been installed to address
trichloroethylene (TCE) and its daughter products at an
active chemical manufacturing facility in Tennessee. Most
of the TCE mass in the source area was detected in
fractured limestone bedrock at depths of approximately 9
to 12 meters below ground surface. The groundwater
extraction and treatment system had reached a point of
diminishing returns, yielding less than 0.5 kg of TCE per
year of operation even though average TCE concentrations
in source area wells remained on the order of 5,000 ug/L.
Bioremediation was implemented by adding emulsified
soybean oil at a concentration of approximately 1% by
volume into five source area wells. After achieving
anaerobic and reducing conditions in the amended wells, 5
liters of a microbial culture (KB-1™) containing
dehalococcoides bacteria was added to each well. Within
six months after addition of the microbial culture, total
chlorinated volatile organic compound (CVOC)
concentrations decreased by approximately 85%. The
estimated dissolved mass of TCE destroyed by
bioremediation in the source area was approximately 6.7
kg; the total TCE mass destroyed is likely much greater
due to biodegradation of CVOCs sorbed or trapped in the
rock matrix. The cost of the bioremediation remedy was
roughly equivalent to the cost of 18 months of operation
of the groundwater extraction and treatment system. Based
on the data obtained from bioremediation in the source
area, a line of downgradient biobarrier wells was
installed in December 2006 to mitigate offsite migration
of the residual CVOC plume.
Transport
of Lactate and in-situ Bioremediation of
Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) under Direct Current
Xingzhi
Wu, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 400
Snell Engineering Center, Northeastern University, 360
Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, Tel: 617-373-3994,
Email: wuxingzhifu@yahoo.com
David
B. Gent,
Environmental Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and
Development Center, 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS
39180, Tel: 1-601-634-4822, Fax: 1-601-634-3518, Email: David.B.Gent@erdc.usace.amry.mil
Akram Alshawabkeh, Associate Professor, Department of
Civil and Environmental Engineering, 400 Snell Engineering
Center, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue,
Boston, MA 02115, Tel: 617-373-3994, Fax: 617-373-4419,
Email: aalsha@neu.edu
Jeffrey L. Davis, Environmental Laboratory, US Army
Engineer Research and Development Center, 3909 Halls Ferry
Road, Vicksburg, MS 39180, Tel: 601-634-4822, Fax:
601-634-3518, Email: Jeffery.L.Davis@erdc.usace.amry.mil
Bioremediation
of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) by reductive dechlorination
has been successful when the microorganisms are supplied
an additional electron donor such as lactate. However in
heterogeneous PCE contaminated aquifers, uniform
delivery and mixing of electron donor amendment have met
limited success because the electron donors cannot be
delivered into the low permeable zones.
Electrochemical amendment injection provides an
alternative to hydraulic methods by delivering the
electron donor to microorganisms in the low permeable
zones where hydraulic delivery fails.
Lactate
injection experiments were conducted in clay (kh = 2x10-7
cm s-1) and heterogeneous soil under 1.2
A m-2 and 5.3 A m-2 current
densities. Additional
experiments mixed Dehalococcoides dechlorinator KB-1™
culture (
SiREM
,
Ontario
,
Canada
) with PCE (20 mg L-1 in the pore water) in a
clay-water slurry and consolidated the slurry in a
nitrogen filled anaerobic chamber.
Electroosmotic and ion migration transport rates
averaged 2.16 cm2 V-1day-1
and 3.4 cm day-1, respectively. Pore water
lactate concentrations reached as high as 800 mg L-1.
The ion migration rate was more than 191 times
faster than transport under a hydraulic gradient.
No biological fouling was observed under the
experiments using electrochemical injection.
The PCE and the KB-1™ culture mixed (no
electricity) with the clay resulted in partial
dechlorination of PCE halting at cis-DCE presumably
because of absence of an electron donor.
The duplicate PCE and KB-1™ culture experiments
with lactate injection by electrochemical means completely
degraded PCE to ethene within 4 months across the 40 cm
long silty clay medium.
PCE was transformed to DCE following a zero order
rate of 0.0063 to 0.027 mmol L-1∙day-1
and the transformation of DCE to ethane followed a first
order specific remediation rate of 0.0577 to 0.254 day-1.
The soil pH remained between 7 and 7.5 throughout
the experiment.
Top
|