|
Laser-Induced
Fluorescence for the Delineation & Characterization of
Fuel-Contaminated Soils in Subarctic Climates
Kenneth R. Andraschko, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Alaska District, Elmendorf AFB
Use
of a Collaborative Dataset to Enhance Data
Representativeness
Louis Burkhardt, Raytheon, Sudbury, MA
Use
of Borehole Geophysical Logging, Packer Testing, and
Discrete Groundwater Sampling in Assessment and
Remediation of a Release of #2 Fuel Oil at a Western
Massachusetts Residence
Jeffrey W. Garretson, ENPRO Services, Inc.,
Newburyport, MA
Sampling
Sediment Porewater in the Lower Duwamish Waterway Using a
Passive Sampler
Jay Hodny, W. L. Gore and Associates, Inc., Elkton, MD
A
Study of Tritium in Municipal Solid Waste Leachate
Robert D. Mutch, Jr., HydroQual,Inc.,
Mahwah
,
NJ
The
Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water into a
Surrounding Community from Repeated Waste Spills from a
Nuclear Power Plant
Paul Rosenfeld, UCLA School of Public Health, Los
Angeles, CA
Laser-Induced
Fluorescence for the Delineation & Characterization of
Fuel-Contaminated Soils in Subarctic Climates
Kenneth
R. Andraschko,
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District, CEPOA-EN-EE,
P.O. Box 6898, Elmendorf AFB, AK
99506-6898, Tel:
907-753-5647, Fax:
907-753-2820
Charley S. Peyton, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska
District, CEPOA-PM-C, P.O. Box 6898, Elmendorf AFB, AK
99506-6898, Tel:
907-753-5718, Fax:
907-753-5626
Fuel-contaminated
sites are common projects for environmental professionals.
A key factor in successfully designing a remedial
approach for these sites is an accurate estimate of the
nature, quantity and location of contaminated soil.
This is problematic with standard sampling
techniques, often leading to large errors, extended field
work and cost overruns.
These problems are magnified in Alaska and other
regions where short work seasons and difficult logistics
are common. Using
a real-time, in situ laser-induced fluorescence (LIF)
technique, the Corps of Engineers has been able to
delineate fuel-contaminated soils with great accuracy in
and above the saturated zones.
The technology can also differentiate between
contaminant types such as gasoline, diesel or bunker fuel
oil. Subsequent
remedial actions can then be more accurately designed and
bid, saving time and money.
In addition to a discussion of the technology, case
studies will be presented of projects in which LIF was
used to address soil excavation, in situ treatment, or
potentially responsible party issues.
Use
of a Collaborative Dataset to Enhance Data
Representativeness
Louis
Burkhardt,
Raytheon, 528 Boston Post Road, MS 1880, Sudbury, MA
01776, Tel: 978-440-1855, Fax: 978-440-1800, Email:
louis_j_burkhardt@raytheon.com
R. Joseph Fiacco, Jr., ERM, 399 Boylston St., 6th Floor,
Boston, MA 02116, Tel: 617-646-7840, Fax: 617-267-6447,
Email: joe.fiacco@erm.com
Michael Ravella, ERM, 399 Boylston St., 6th
Floor, Boston, MA 02116, Tel: 617-646-7808, Fax:
617-267-6447, Email: mike.ravella@erm.com
Maelle Duquoc, ERM, 399 Boylston St., 6th Floor, Boston,
MA 02116, Tel: 617-646-7809, Fax: 617-267-6447, Email:
maelle.duquoc@erm.com
Camillo Coladonato, ERM, 399 Boylston St., 6th Floor,
Boston, MA 02116, Tel: 617-646-7808, Fax: 617-267-6447,
Email: camillo.coladonato@erm.com
Johannes Mark, ERM, 399 Boylston St., 6th
Floor, Boston, MA 02116, Tel: 617-646-7835, Fax:
617-267-6447, Email: johannes.mark@erm.com
Eric J. Moore ERM, 399 Boylston St., 6th Floor,
Boston, MA 02116, Tel: 617-646-7818, Fax: 617-267-6447,
Email: eric.moore@erm.com
Effective
characterization of chlorinated solvent sites in glaciated
terrains presents a number of technical challenges. The
highly heterogeneous nature of stratified glacial
sedimentary deposits results in complex distribution of
chlorinated volatile organic compounds (CVOCs-within
source zones and associated dissolved-phase plumes.
Typically, source zones consist of residual dense
non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL), diffused CVOCs, and/or
sorbed CVOCs located in relatively low permeability zones.
In some cases, these relatively low permeability zones are
obvious silt or clay layers, but in many other cases they
are indiscernibly finer-grained sand lenses that can be
difficult to locate. Dissolved-phase CVOC plumes emanating
from these source areas typically exhibit the general
dimensions of the source area, due to minimal transverse
dispersivity, and migrate within relatively high
permeability zones.
Cost-effective
characterization of CVOC sites in glaciated terrains
requires an innovative approach, such as the Triad
approach. The Triad approach is characterized by three
major components: systematic project planning, dynamic
work strategies, and real-time measurement technologies.
The ultimate objective of a Triad investigation is
to enhance data representativeness and reduce uncertainty.
Historically, significant focus has been placed on
reducing analytical uncertainty, with significantly less
focus placed on reducing sampling uncertainty. One
approach for reducing both sample and analytical
uncertainty involves the generation of collaborative
datasets. Collaborative datasets involve the collection of
relatively closely spaced, lower-cost, semi-quantitative
to quantitative field data combined with a limited number
of strategically located, higher-cost, traditional,
quantitative laboratory data (e.g., soil and groundwater
samples). The traditional data are used to “calibrate”
the field data, resulting in development of detailed
three-dimensional characterization datasets.
A
Triad investigation was conducted at a complex site in
eastern Massachusetts. A collaborative dataset was
generated using the membrane interface probe (MIP),
modified Waterloo Profiler, and traditional monitoring
wells. Collectively, these data were used to define a
series of chlorinated solvent source areas and plumes at
the site. Relative to historical investigations conducted
at the site, development of a collaborative data set
significantly reduced uncertainty associated with the
site.
Use
of Borehole Geophysical Logging, Packer Testing, and
Discrete Groundwater Sampling in Assessment and
Remediation of a Release of #2 Fuel Oil at a Western
Massachusetts Residence
Jeffrey
W. Garretson,
Project Manager, ENPRO Services, Inc., 12 Mulliken Way,
Newburyport, MA, Tel: 978-465-1595, Fax: 978-465-2050,
Email: jgarretson@enpro.com
Geoffrey A. Brown, Ph.D., ENPRO Services, Inc.,
Newburyport, MA
Mario Carnevale, Hager GeoScience, Inc., Woburn, MA
A
release of more than 250 gallons of #2 fuel oil at a
Western Massachusetts
residence was discovered in April 2006.
The release appeared to be attributable to a
leaking fuel oil storage tank line that lay under the
concrete floor. The
released fuel oil entered bedrock fractures beneath the
residence and impacted 150- and 250-foot deep bedrock
drinking water wells at the subject site and at an
adjacent residence. In
an attempt to determine the extent of petroleum impacts in
bedrock, borehole geophysical logging was performed on the
two impacted wells to characterize bedrock fractures in
the wells. Equipment
utilized in the borehole logging included: a borehole
diameter caliper probe; formation resistivity, single
point resistance and spontaneous potential electric
probes; a natural gamma radiation probe; fluid temperature
and resistivity probes; an acoustic televiewer probe; and
a heat pulse flow meter probe (under both ambient and
stressed conditions).
The geophysical results provided data on bedrock
fracture size, depth, orientation, and conductivity.
Based on the data, packer testing was performed to
provide additional information on fracture conductivity
and to allow collection of groundwater samples from
discrete depths. The
geophysical, hydrologic, and chemical data were
subsequently utilized to develop a bedrock assessment
program including installation, evaluation, and monitoring
of five additional bedrock wells located to intercept the
more impacted fractures.
Data from all bedrock wells were subsequently used
to design and implement systems for both groundwater
recovery and ex-situ treatment and in-situ soil and
groundwater treatment via chemical oxidation (Fenton’s
Reagent).
Sampling
Sediment Porewater in the Lower Duwamish Waterway Using a
Passive Sampler
Jay
W. Hodny, Ph.D., W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., 100
Chesapeake Boulevard, Elkton, MD 21921, Tel: 410-392-7600,
Fax: 410-506-4774, Email: jhodny@wlgore.com
Teri A. Floyd, Ph.D., Floyd and Snider, Inc., Two Union
Square, 601 Union Street, Suite 600, Seattle, WA 98101,
Tel: 206-292-2078, Fax: 206-682-7867, Email: Teri.Floyd@floydsnider.com
Collecting
porewater samples in freshwater and marine environments is
challenging even under ideal sampling conditions.
Sampling difficulties may lead to poor data
quality, damage to ecologically sensitive areas, and
unnecessary expense. To
insure data quality and minimize environmental damage,
membrane-based passive samplers offer a unique screening
method to identify and delineate contaminated porewater
and sediment. Subsequent
more complex and invasive sampling can then be focused,
effective and economical. The Washington State Department
of Ecology and the US EPA have been overseeing sediment
characterization and cleanup efforts along the Lower
Duwamish Waterway, now listed on the Superfund National
Priorities List. An
embayment was investigated to determine whether
groundwater, contaminated by chlorinated compounds from
upgradient sources, was entering the river by upwelling
through the embayment sediments or through shallow
localized seeps. The
investigation included deployment of patented, passive
samplers, constructed of GORE-TEX® membrane and
hydrophobic adsorbents.
The samplers proved to be an accurate, sensitive,
easy-to-use porewater sampling tool. The passive samplers
were driven into the embayment and seep sediment during
two phases of investigation.
The first phase focused on the embayment area,
while the second phase focused on two of the seeps
suspected of being the exit points for contaminated
groundwater. Sediment
samples were also taken and the porewater analyzed.
The datasets generated by the passive sampling and
the conventional method were closely correlated and
confirmed the passive sampler’s detection capability in
sediment porewater. Seven
years later, porewater sampling using piezometers and
peepers also confirmed the original passive sampling
results. Passive sampling provided an accurate and
economical method to characterize the location and extent
of contaminated groundwater entering an embayment in the
Lower Duwamish Waterway from an upgradient facility, and
focused subsequent sampling efforts.
The investigation is presented, and includes
discussions on the passive sampler and the results of the
investigation.
A
Study of Tritium in Municipal Solid Waste Leachate
Robert
D. Mutch, Jr.,
P.Hg., P.E. (MSCE), HydroQual, Inc., 1200 MacArthur Blvd.,
Mahwah, New Jersey 07430, Tel:
201-529-5151, Fax:
201-529-5728, Email: rmutch@hydroqual.com
Richard Carbonaro, Ph.D., Manhattan College, Riverdale, NY
10471, Tel: 718-862-7276,
Fax: 718-862-8018,
Email: rcarbonaro@manhattan.edu
A
study was conducted of tritium levels in leachate from
landfills in New York and New Jersey.
Recent studies, including this study of landfills
in New York and New Jersey, have revealed that leachate
from municipal solid waste landfills commonly contains
surprisingly high levels of tritium.
In this study the mean level of tritium in the
leachate from ten different landfills was 33,800 pCi/L,
with a high of 192,000 pCi/L.
In a similar study of landfills in Pennsylvania,
the mean level of tritium was 20,900 pCi/L with values as
high as 182,000 pCi/L.
In contrast, current levels of tritium in
precipitation average 50 to 100 picoCuries per liter (pCi/L)
and have been steadily declining since the early 1960’s
when atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons caused tritium
levels over
North America
to reach levels as high as 15,000 pCi/L. The Maximum
Contaminant Level (MCL) set by the USEPA for tritium is
20,000 pCi/L. Tritium
also manifests itself in landfill gas and landfill gas
system condensates. In
a recent study of tritium levels in landfills in
California, one landfill gas condensate sample was found
to contain 551,000 pCi/L of tritium, a level more than 27
times the USEPA MCL.
The
principal source of tritium in municipal solid waste
leachate and landfill gas condensates is believed to be
gaseous tritium lighting devices.
Self-powered exit signs are the most common
examples of these devices.
Some of these gaseous tritium-containing exit signs
contain as much as 25 to 30 Curies of tritium.
Although these devices are regulated by the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission and require proper handling and
disposal methods, they often find their way into municipal
solid waste.
This
paper discusses levels of tritium observed in this and
other recent studies and discusses the implications to
landfill worker health and safety, leachate treatment, and
leachate monitoring and detection.
The
Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water into a
Surrounding Community from Repeated Waste Spills from a
Nuclear Power Plant
Paul
Rosenfeld,
Ph.D, UCLA School of Public Health, 16-035 CHS, Box
951772, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, Tel: 310-795-2335, Email: prosenfe@ucla.edu
Amy Hensley, M.S., UCLA School of Public
Health, 16-035 CHS, Box 951772, Los Angeles, CA, 90095,
Tel: 310-622-3350, Email: arhensley@gmail.com
Andrew Scott, B.S., Soil/ Water/ Air Protection
Enterprise, 201 Wilshire Blvd, 2nd Floor, Santa Monica,
CA, 90401, Tel: 559-260-2180, Email: Andrew@swape.com
James Clark, Ph.D., Soil/ Water/ Air Protection
Enterprise, 201 Wilshire Blvd, 2nd Floor, Santa Monica,
CA, 90401, Tel: 310-907-6165, Email: jclark@swape.com
The
Excelon Nuclear Power Plant (ENPP), located in Braceville,
Illinois has historically released tritiated water and
airborne tritium into the surrounding residential
community. ENPP discharges its tritium waste via a
“blow down line (BDL),” a pipe that runs through the
surrounding community emptying in the Kankakee River.
Along the BDL are vacuum breakers (VB-1 to VB-11)
which regulate pressure along the line. Since 1996,
there have been at least three major spills resulting from
failures of the VBs. In November 1996, VB-1 broke,
releasing over 300,000 gallons of water containing
tritium. In December 1998, VB-3 leaked 2.9 million gallons
of contaminated water over a 30-day period; possibly
containing tritium concentrations between 624,000 pCi/L
and 1,852,000 pCi/L. There was no remediation of the
standing water from this release. In November 2000,
failure of VB-2 released an estimated 3 million gallons of
water containing tritium at concentrations between 167,000
pCi/L and 3,103,000 pCi/L. Ground water sampling from 2005
to 2006 has shown that maximum concentrations of tritium
were above the U.S.EPA MCL of 20,000 pCi/L. In addition,
sampling was conducted by ENPP and the local environmental
agency. As a result, the released tritium has impacted
air, ground water, and vegetation of the surrounding
community. We conducted a field investigation of the
community surrounding the ENPP and have determined that
the released tritium continues to impact air, ground
water, and vegetation. Litigation against ENPP has been
launched due to the repeated trespass of waste products
into the surrounding community, diminishing its property
value.
Top
|