Identification
of Natural Gas Sources Using Geochemical Forensic Tools
Tarek Saba, Exponent, Inc., Maynard, MA
PCB
Source and Dechlorination Fingerprinting
Stephen Emsbo-Mattingly, NewFields Environmental
Forensics Practice LLC, Rockland, MA
Forensic
Analysis and PCB Fingerprinting in Sediments Using
Congener Data and Multiple Statistical Evaluation Methods
Noémi
Barabás, Limno-Tech, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI
Fact
or Fiction: The Source of Perchloroethylene Contamination
in Groundwater is a Manufacturing Impurity in Chlorinated
Solvents
Valerie Lane, GeoTrans, Inc., Harvard, MA
Thoughts
on Manufacturing Changes in the US Petroleum Industry:
Implications for Age-dating, Calculating Weathering
Indices and Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting
Dr. Michael
Wade, Wade Research, Inc., Marshfield, MA
Age-Dating
Diesel Fuel: A Case Study Averse to the Christensen
and Larsen Method
Scott A. Stout, NewFields, Rockland, MA
Identification
of Natural Gas Sources Using Geochemical Forensic Tools
Paul
Boehm, Ph.D., Exponent, Inc., 3 Clock Tower Place, Suite 205,
Maynard,
MA
01754, Tel: 978-461-1220, Fax: 978-461-1223
Tarek
Saba,
Ph.D., Exponent, Inc.,
3 Clock Tower Place, Suite 205, Maynard,
MA
01754, Tel: 978-461-1233, Fax: 978-461-1223
Laurie Benton, Ph.D., 15375 SE 30th Place, Suite 250,
Bellevue,
WA
98007, Tel: 425-519-8754, Fax: 425-519-8799
Processed
natural gas (storage gas) from a number of states has been
transported to the permitted storage facility and injected
in an underground formation 900 ft below ground surface.
The formation is surrounded by geologic divides initially
thought to be preventing gas from escaping the storage
formation (storage field) boundaries. Recently, pressure
monitoring in observation wells around the storage field
indicated that the southern divide is leaking storage gas.
In addition, property owners south of the field have begun
producing natural gas and claim that the natural gas they
are extracting is native gas from the area and not storage
gas escaping the field. The objective of this work was to
apply knowledge of oil and natural gas geochemistry and
geochemical fingerprinting techniques to determine if
storage gas is escaping the southern divide; to determine
the extent of storage gas migration beyond the divide; and
to determine if the other companies are extracting storage
or native gas. A field investigation was conducted where
gas samples were collected from the storage field and from
observation wells located outside (south of) the field.
Samples were analyzed for gas hydrocarbons and
nonhydrocarbons, and stable isotope compositions (carbon
for methane and ethane). Using double ratio analysis
(hydrocarbons represented by C1/C2+), tracers (helium),
and carbon isotope ratio of ethane, the different
fingerprints of native and storage gases were identified.
The analysis determined that gas in the observation wells
across the southern divide is storage gas indicating that
the divide is in fact leaking. This work showed that
storage gas is migrating beyond the storage field boundary
and that property owners adjacent to the field are
extracting storage gas escaping the field.
PCB
Source and Dechlorination Fingerprinting
Stephen
Emsbo-Mattingly,
M.S., NewFields Environmental Forensics Practice, LLC, 100
Ledgewood Place, Suite 302, Rockland, MA 02370, Tel:
781-681-5040
Victor Magar, Ph.D., ENVIRON International
Corporation -
Chicago,
IL, 123 North Wacker Drive, Suite 250, Chicago, IL
60606, Tel: 312-853-9430
Marc Mills, Ph.D., USEPA ORD NRMRL,26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., MS 420, Cincinnati,
OH
45268, Tel: 513-569 7322
Richard Brenner, Ph.D., USEPA ORD NRMRL, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr.,
MS 420, Cincinnati, OH
45268, Tel: 513-569 7322
Detailed
chemical forensic analyses were conducted to characterize
source and chemical alteration congener compositions in
lake sediments. At
the Lake Hartwell Superfund Site (
Pickens County
,
SC
), surface sediments resembled a 50/50 mixture of Aroclors
1248 and 1254. Congeners
became increasingly dominated by lower chlorinated
congeners with sediment depth and corresponding age,
resulting in a relative accumulation of ortho chlorines
and loss of meta and para chlorines; ortho chlorines were
highly conserved.
This
study presents a quantitative approach used to measure
dechlorination processes in situ.
The conservation of ortho chlorines with depth
allowed the use of ortho chlorines to serve as a unique
fingerprint of the original source material and
dechlorination byproducts.
Toxic equivalencies were calculated using Toxic
Equivalency Factors listed by the World Health
Organization (WHO). WHO
congeners were preferentially removed under natural
conditions resulting in an apparent reduction in toxicity
relative to total PCB mass.
Forensic
Analysis and PCB Fingerprinting in Sediments Using
Congener Data and Multiple Statistical Evaluation Methods
Noémi
Barabás,
Ph.D., Limno-Tech, Inc., 501 Avis Drive, Ann Arbor, MI
48108, Tel: 734-332-1200, Fax: 734-332-1212, Email:
nbarabas@limno.com
Carrie Graff, Ph.D, Limno-Tech, Inc, 1705
DeSales St., NW, Washington, D.C. 20036, Tel:
202-833-9140, Fax: 202-833-9094, Email: cgraff@limno.com
Rich Galloway, Honeywell International, 101 Columbia Road
,
Morristown,
NJ
07962, Tel: 973-455-4640, Email:
rich.galloway@honeywell.com
Daniel Herrema, P.E., Limno-Tech, Inc., 501 Avis Drive,
Ann Arbor, MI 48108,
Tel: 734-332-1200, Fax: 734-332-1212, Email: dherrema@limno.com
Timothy J. Dekker, P.E., Ph. D., Limno-Tech,
Inc., 501 Avis Drive, Ann Arbor, MI
48108, Tel: 734-332-1200, Fax: 734-332-1212, Email:
tdekker@limno.com
A
study was performed to determine the PCB sources and fate
processes affecting congener compositions in an estuarine
contaminated sediment site in
New Jersey
. PCB
contamination of sediments can originate from different
sources and Aroclor mixtures, and fate processes can
modify congener signatures.
Such signatures can help identify Aroclor mixtures,
their sources and relevant fate processes.
Multivariate statistical evaluation of PCB congener
patterns in sediment samples, compared to known
signatures, allows identification of Aroclor fingerprints,
chemical alteration processes, spatial distribution of
Aroclors and alteration patterns, and a refined
understanding of processes responsible for transporting
solids/contaminants across the site.
Multivariate analysis depends on incomplete mixing
within the sediment environment, preserving various
degrees of statistically detectable ‘signals’ of the
original mixtures (Aroclors) in each sample.
Three levels of statistical analysis were used to
identify Aroclor fingerprints, and formulate hypotheses
about source identities and fate processes.
The congener composition of individual samples, the
spatial pattern of sample compositions, and the
correlation patterns of congeners indicated the presence
of more than one distinctive pattern at the site.
Principal component analysis (PCA) confirmed this
interpretation, and polytopic vector analysis (PVA) was
performed to determine their compositions and relative
importance. PVA
“unmixes” congener distributions within samples and
predicts congener distributions of candidate source
fingerprints. PVA is based on traditional PCA and
subsequent rotation of principal component axes until all
PC compositions and their sample loadings are positive.
Results point to both on-site and potential off-site
sources of PCB impacts.
PCB contamination is dominated by Aroclor 1248, and
congener patterns in buried sediments have been altered by
dechlorination processes over time.
Results also allowed for evaluation of Aroclor
concentration gradients across the system, and clarified
the major sediment transport processes operative at the
site.
Fact
or Fiction: The
Source of Perchloroethylene Contamination in Groundwater
is a Manufacturing Impurity in Chlorinated Solvents
Valerie A. Lane, GeoTrans, Inc., 6 Lancaster County
Road, Harvard, MA, 01451
James S. Smith, Ph.D., CPC, Trillium, Inc., 8 Grace's
Drive, Coatesville, PA 19320-1206
Manufacturing
impurities in chlorinated solvents have been considered to
be sources of contamination in groundwater. Chlorinated
solvents are manufactured in a variety of grades; the
technical grade is used at many industrial and
manufacturing facilities. Compounds present as
manufacturing impurities in technical grade chlorinated
solvents vary, and their quantity is extremely small or
not measurable, because chlorinated solvents historically
have been manufactured to a high degree of purity. The
purity of currently manufactured TCE ranges from 99.9% for
reagent grade to 98.0% for the technical grade. Impurities
in technical
grade 1,2-dichloroethane, also known as ethylene
dichloride (EDC), manufactured within the last 10 years
with purities of 99.9991% and 99.9955% included PCE
between about 0.0001% and 0.0006%, respectively.
In
a number of litigation cases where TCE released from a
vapor degreaser is the major contaminant in groundwater,
there is an accompanying minor concentration of PCE. The
assumption made in these cases is that the PCE impurity in
technical grades of TCE is the source of the PCE in
groundwater. This assumption is based on the release of
these two compounds together from a distillation bottom
residue where PCE is concentrated, relative to the TCE,
because of its much higher boiling point at atmospheric
pressure.
There
is no peer reviewed literature that can be cited to prove
that PCE is a significant impurity in either the
distillation bottoms produced from a vapor degreaser or
technical grade TCE. PCE, if present as a manufacturing
impurity, is present in such small amounts that
significant concentrations would not be generated in
groundwater. When PCE and TCE are present together in
groundwater, the source of the PCE is likely not an
impurity in the manufactured TCE.
Thoughts
on Manufacturing Changes in the US Petroleum Industry:
Implications for Age-dating, Calculating Weathering
Indices and Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting
Dr.
Michael Wade, Wade Research, Inc., 110 Holly Road,
Marshfield, MA 02050, Tel: 781-837-5504, Email: mjwade@waderesearch.com
Techniques
for the aging of petroleum contamination in environmental
matrices are undergoing major revision in the
environmental forensic community at the present time.
Techniques that were reliable in the past to age-date
gasoline may not be that reliable in the reality of
today's modern refinery practices. Age-dating of
distillate fuels is undergoing a major debate in the
forensics community at the present time. Forces working to
expand the use of hydrocarbon degradation models from
soils to other matrices may have pushed the most
widely-used weathering approach too far, creating a
two-sided debate which has not been settled in the peer
reviewed literature as of now. Problems with numerous
approaches to age-date gasoline and distillate fuel
contamination will be outlined, and discussed. Both the
positive and negative aspects of numerous common
approaches will be discussed. Recommendations for
cautiously age-dating petroleum in the environment will be
presented.
Age-Dating
Diesel Fuel: A Case Study Averse to the Christensen
and Larsen Method
Scott
A. Stout, NewFields, 100 Ledgewood Place, Suite 302,
Rockland, MA 02370, Tel: 781- 681-5040, Fax: 781-
681-5048, Email: sstout@newfields.com
Gregory S. Douglas, NewFields, 100 Ledgewood Place, Suite
302, Rockland, MA 02370, Tel: 781- 681-5040, Fax: 781-
681-5048, Email: gdouglas@newfields.com
Age
dating petroleum products is a valuable forensic tool
because it can be used to determine the time of release
(i.e., ownership) and subsequent liability for site clean
up costs. Diesel
fuels necessarily contain abundant normal alkanes, i.e.,
the class of hydrocarbons that most easily ignite under
compression, and numerous iso-paraffins within the same
boiling ranges as the normal alkanes.
It has been long recognized that comparably boiling
normal alkanes are more susceptible to biodegradation in
the environment than iso-paraffins.
Investigators
have used the ratio(s) between selected normal alkanes
(e.g., n-C17) and iso-paraffins (e.g., pristine) to
compare the extent of biodegradation among diesel fuel
residues in environmental samples.
Christensen and Larsen (1993) reviewed data for
soils from several European sites with documented release
histories and concluded that the ratio of n-C17/Pr in soil
extracts could be used to estimate the length of time (up
to 20 years ± 2.1 years) that diesel fuel had been in the
environment, so long as certain conditions were met.
Although the universal validity of the Christensen
and Larsen Method has been debated, one particular
condition – a single release of diesel fuel at a
particular point in time – is extremely rare and/or
difficult to prove at most petroleum handling facilities.
Consequently, subsequent testing of the Christensen
and Larsen Method has been extremely rare.
In
this case study, a catastrophic release of approximately
6000 gallons of on-road diesel fuel #2 occurred when an
underground storage tank (UST) was accidentally punctured
during drilling in February 1991.
When “fresh” NAPL appeared in 2002, the issue
of its “age” was of paramount importance since the
property had changed ownership.
In 2003, NAPLs and impacted soils throughout the
study area were collected and analyzed using detailed
chemical fingerprinting as a means of assessing the
“age” of the contamination.
The NAPLs were minimally biodegraded (n-C17/Pr ~
1.6), exhibited a consistent “genetic’ character
(e.g., sesquiterpane and methyl-phenanthene patterns and
relative S-PAH abundance), and contained 1870 to 2500 ppm
total sulfur, which according to the Federal On-Road
Diesel Fuel Sulfur Reduction Act of 1993 indicated the
NAPLs’ parent fuel was used/released before November
1993. The
soils collected in 2003 met the aforementioned conditions
of the Christensen and Larsen Model, yet despite
exhibiting consistent genetic features with each other and
with the NAPLs, exhibited a wide range of n-C17/Pr ratios
(0.0 to 1.8) which would imply “ages” between 20+ and
~4.5 years. These
results argue that despite a one-time release of a
particular type of diesel fuel in 1991, the rates of
normal alkane biodegradation within this site’s soils
were sufficiently variable to confound the application of
Christensen and Larsen Model.
The high sulfur contents of the NAPLs and the
“genetic” comparability to the soils provided a
defensible basis to attribute both the NAPL and soil
contamination to the 1991 catastrophic release – and not
a new release(s).
The “sudden” appearance of NAPL in 2002, which
promulgated this study, occurred after a marked drop in
groundwater elevation due to drought
– and not a new release(s).
This case study serves to emphasize the imprecision
of the Christensen and Larsen Method for age-dating diesel
fuel residues in soils and, certainly its
inappropriateness for age-dating NAPLs.
Top
|