Containment
of a Perchlorate Plume from the use of Road Flares in a
Wellhead Protection Area
Thomas C. Cambareri, Cape Cod Commission, Barnstable,
MA
Perchlorate
Remediation using a Novel Autotrophic,
Perchlorate-Reducing Microbial Community
Teresa A. Conneely, University of Massachusetts,
Amherst, MA
Effects
of Reducing Conditions on the Fate and Transport of RDX in
Groundwater
Michael W. Morris, Jacobs Engineering, Bourne, MA
Rejuvenation
of Biowalls Used to Treat Perchlorate in Groundwater
Tom
Beisel, CH2M HILL,
Atlanta
,
GA
Field
Evaluation of Release of Explosives Compounds from a
Cracked UXO Item Using a Pan Lysimeter
Christopher Abate, AMEC Earth & Environmental,
Westford, MA
Grenade
Range Management Using Lime for Dual Role of Metals
Immobilization and Explosives Transformation Treatability
Study
Steven L. Larson, U.S. Army Engineer Research and
Development Center, Vicksburg, MS
Military
Munitions Response Program Site Inspections for Formerly
Used Defense Sites – Munitions Constituents Sampling
Deborah Dixon Walker, US Army Engineering Support
Center Huntsville, Huntsville, AL
Containment
of a Perchlorate Plume from the use of Road Flares in a
Wellhead Protection Area
Thomas
C Cambareri
and Scott Michaud, Cape Cod Commission, 3225 Main Street,
PO Box 226, Barnstable, MA 02630, Tel: 508-362-3828, Fax:
508-362-3136
The
Barnstable Fire Training Academy is a multi-purpose
training facility for public safety officials serving Cape
Cod and southeast Mass.
The site has been in operation since the 1950s.
The facility has been the site of chronic releases
of petroleum hydrocarbons during fire training activities.
Use of petroleum was ceased in 1986 when
significant hydrocarbon pollution was discovered.
Clean-up activities consisted of an extensive
monitoring network, soil removals, vapor extraction, 18
years of pump and treat and recently a C-Sparge Perozone®
system. Fire
training activities have continued with the burning of
straw. Expired marine and road flares are typically
brought to local Cape Cod fire departments for disposal
and collected at the training facility. The practice of
using road and marine flares to ignite the straw was
discovered at the site as the Mass DEP was promulgating a
maximum contaminant level of 2 ppb, the strictest
standards for perchlorate in groundwater in the nation.
Groundwater sampled from the existing monitoring
network revealed perchlorate concentrations ranging from
trace levels to 50 ppb in a plume extending 1500 feet
downgradient to public water supplies.
Diluted levels of perchlorate below 1 ppb are
observed in the water supplies.
An Immediate Response Action is being conducted to
assess and model the contaminant/water supply interactions
and to recover and treat perchlorate-contaminated
groundwater with a perchlorate-selective resin before it
is returned to the aquifer.
The IRA results will be presented along with
appropriate practices for disposal of expired flares
collected by public safety officials.
Perchlorate
Remediation using a Novel Autotrophic,
Perchlorate-Reducing Microbial Community
Student
Presenter
Teresa
A. Conneely,
Doctoral Candidate, Department of Microbiology, 203
Morrill Science Center IVN, University of
Massachusetts
, 639 North Pleasant Street, Amherst,
MA
01003
, Tel:
413-545-1204, Fax: 413-545-1578, Email:
tconneel@microbio.umass.edu
Ashish K. Sahu, Doctoral Candidate, College of
Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental
Engineering, Box 5205, Marston Hall 18B, University of
Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, Tel:
413-547-3229, Fax: 413-545-2202, Email: aksahu@acad.umass.edu
Sarina J. Ergas, Ph.D., P.E., College of Engineering,
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Box
5205, Marston Hall 18B, University of Massachusetts
Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, Tel: 413-545-3424, Fax:
413-545-2202, Email: ergas@ecs.umass.edu
Klaus Nüsslein, Ph.D., Department of Microbiology, 203
Morrill Science Center IVN, University of Massachusetts,
639 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA 01003, Tel:
413-545-1204, Fax: 413-545-1578, Email: nusslein@microbio.umass.edu
Perchlorate
contamination of groundwater can be hazardous to human
health. Bioremediation is an economical method for
perchlorate reduction. A novel microbial community that
autotrophically reduces perchlorate using perchlorate as
an electron acceptor and elemental sulfur (S0) pellets as
an electron donor was investigated. Benefits of using S0
pellets are: the pellets are inexpensive, readily
available, a versatile packing material for ex-situ and
in-situ applications and the pellets serve as an excellent
electron donor since bacteria grown autotrophically
produce low levels of biomass, thus, reducing system
maintenance. In a packed-bed bioreactor, filled with S0
pellet and oyster shell and using an enrichment culture of
denitrifying sludge from a wastewater treatment plant as
the microbial inoculum, perchlorate is reduced to below
detection limits. We investigated the Sulfur Utilizing
Perchlorate-Reducing Bacteria (SUPeRB); samples of the
bioreactor packing material and the perchlorate treatment
feed were examined using culture dependent and culture
independent techniques. Phylogenetic analysis, using the
16S rRNA gene sequence, showed that the microbial
community was predominantly composed of members of the
beta-proteobacteria. Upon comparison to the GenBank DNA
sequence database sequences were found to be similar to
those of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria and potential
perchlorate-reducing bacteria. The detection of the
chlorite dismutase (cld) gene in these samples further
supports the presence of perchlorate-reducing bacteria.
Also, using a fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)
probe for members of a known perchlorate-reducing bacteria
genus, Dechloromonas, it was shown that Dechloromonas spp.
were present in the bioreactor. Samples were diluted to
extinction in broth culture to ensure isolation of
perchlorate-reducing strains. Isolated strains will be
grown in pure culture for further study.
Effects
of Reducing Conditions on the Fate and Transport of RDX in
Groundwater
Michael
W. Morris,
Jacobs Engineering, 6 Otis Park Drive,
Bourne, MA 02532, Tel: 508-743-0214,
ext 232, Fax: 508-743-9177
Lonnie Fallin, Jacobs Engineering, 6 Otis Park Drive,
Bourne, MA
02532, Tel: 508-743-0214,
ext 238, Fax: 508-743-9177
Groundwater
investigations conducted at the Massachusetts Military
Reservation show the impact of historic range activities
on the development of groundwater contaminant plumes
emanating from military ranges.
Several of the plumes, located on the southeastern
side of the Reservation, contain elevated concentrations
of RDX. In
most cases, these plumes show continuity from the source
to the leading edge, indicating very little attenuation of
RDX is occurring in the aquifer.
An interesting exception to this trend are the
plumes consisting of RDX and perchlorate which intercept
part of the aquifer that has been previously impacted by a
fuel spill, where reducing conditions due to biological
activity persist. Whereas
perchlorate shows no significant correlation with any
groundwater physiocochemical parameter, RDX shows a
significant correlation with oxidation-reduction potential
and a significant negative correlation with specific
conductance. The
distribution of RDX is more consistent upgradient of the
oxygen depleted zone and implies that RDX (and HMX) are
degrading in the aquifer in the vicinity of the fuel
spill. Possible
explanations for this pattern include 1) lack of a
consistent source, 2) smearing of the plume due to shifts
in the apex of the aquifer, 3) biodegradation, 4)
dispersion, and 5) attenuation of RDX due to reducing
conditions in the aquifer.
The mechanism for RDX attenuation could be
explained by the reduction of nitro aromatic compounds to
primary amines by an oxidation-reduction reaction.
Rejuvenation
of Biowalls Used to Treat Perchlorate in Groundwater
Tom
Beisel, CH2M HILL,
1000 Abernathy Road,
Suite 1600
,
Atlanta
,
GA
,
30328
, Tel: 678-530-4033,
Fax: 770-604-9183, Email: tom.beisel@ch2m.com
Mike Perlmutter, CH2M HILL,
1000 Abernathy Road, Suite 1600
,
Atlanta
,
GA
,
30328
, Tel: 678-530-4033, Fax: 770-604-9183, Email:
Mike.Perlmutter@CH2M.com
Mark Craig, Southern Division of Naval Facilities
Engineering Command, 2155 Eagle Drive, North Charleston,
SC, 29406, Tel: 843-820-5517, Fax: 843-820-5563, Email:
mark.craig@navy.mil
Biowalls
are permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) that use organic
media (e.g., mulch, compost, or wood chips) to provide a
long-term carbon source to facilitate enhanced anaerobic
biodegradation of chlorinated volatile organic compounds (CVOCs)
and perchlorate. More than 13,000 feet of biowalls were
installed from 2002 to 2005 in shallow weathered limestone
at Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant (NWIRP)
McGregor
,
Texas
to (1) reduce “source area” perchlorate plume mass,
(2) remediate perchlorate-contaminated groundwater before
it seeps into streams, and (3) expedite offsite property
clean-up. Thirty-four biowall segments were excavated with
a hydraulic excavator or rock-trencher, depending on the
site geology, and backfilled with a mixture of mushroom
compost, pine wood chips, soybean oil, and limestone
aggregate. Diffuser pipes were installed on the bottom of
each trench to allow for future injections of soybean oil
or other carbon substrates as needed. Rows of bioborings,
which comprise multiple, closely-spaced 12-inch diameter
soil borings backfilled with the PRB media, were installed
in a few locations where biowall construction was
challenging due to surface conditions and an increased
risk of forming a groundwater seep following trench
construction.
Monitoring results
indicated that the biowalls and bioborings rapidly reduced
perchlorate groundwater concentrations from 1 mg/L
(milligrams per liter) to below the laboratory detection
limit. However, in fall 2006, after four years of
operation, decreasing total organic carbon (TOC)
concentrations, increasing levels of perchlorate,
dissolved oxygen (DO), and nitrate, and rising
oxidation-reduction potentials indicated that rejuvenation
was required. Nearly 22,000 pounds of emulsified edible
oil substrate (EOS®598 from EOS Remediation, Inc. of
Raleigh
,
North Carolina
) were injected using a purpose-made injection trailer to
restore the treatment capacity of 15 of the biowalls that
were installed in 2002.
The impact of the supplemental substrate injection on
biowall effectiveness is currently being evaluated. This
presentation will discuss biowall design, construction,
and carbon substrate rejuvenation, and groundwater
sampling results before and after the EOS® was injected.
Field
Evaluation of Release of Explosives Compounds from a
Cracked UXO Item Using a Pan Lysimeter
Christopher
Abate,
AMEC Earth & Environmental, 2 Robbins Road, Westford,
MA 01886, Tel: 978-692-9090, Fax: 978-692-6633
Kim Groff, AMEC Earth & Environmental, 2 Robbins Road,
Westford, MA 01886, Tel: 978-692-9090, Fax: 978-692-6633
Herbert Colby, AMEC Earth & Environmental, 2 Robbins
Road, Westford, MA 01886, Tel: 978-692-9090, Fax:
978-692-6633
Jacob Zaidel, AMEC Earth & Environmental, 2 Robbins
Road, Westford, MA 01886, Tel: 978-692-9090, Fax:
978-692-6633
William Gallagher, U.S. Army, Impact Area Groundwater
Study Program Office, PB 565/567 West Outer Road, Camp
Edwards, MA 02542
Scott Greene, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 696 Virginia
Road, Concord, MA 01742
At
the Massachusetts Military Reservation (MMR) particulate
residues of explosive filler and broken open unexploded
ordnance (UXO) have been observed.
Field investigations confirm that releases of
explosive compounds such as
hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) have
resulted in groundwater plumes.
Characterizing the release of these compounds is
critical in evaluating future impacts to groundwater and
the need for soil/UXO remediation.
Several
field and laboratory studies have addressed explosives
released from particulates (Lever et al 2005, Lynch et al
2002), however, few have addressed UXO.
Thus, a pan lysimeter system was installed in the
shallow subsurface and a cracked 155-mm munition was
placed above it and exposed to the natural environment for
several months. Soil
porewater was collected from this apparatus periodically
(the frequency dictated by precipitation events) and
analyzed for RDX, 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT), and other
explosives compounds.
In addition, measurements of precipitation, volume
of porewater collected, filler surface area exposed, and
other environmental parameters were recorded.
To
date, porewater from 13 sampling events have been
analyzed. Observed
RDX concentrations ranged from 0.4 to 8.9 ppm and TNT
concentrations ranged from 0.13 to 11 ppm.
Preliminary results suggest that: 1) the volume of
porewater collected is typically 60% of precipitation
(indicating 40% evaporation/specific retention), 2) the
compounds principally being released are RDX and TNT, 3)
the cumulative mass released correlates to surface area of
exposed filler and “weathering” of the surface, and 4)
the ratio of RDX to TNT also correlates to the degree of
weathering, indicating the more soluble TNT is depleted
from weathered explosive filler.
Results will be compared to theoretical estimates
of explosives release from perforated UXO (Praxis, 2004,
Lever et al. 2005) and, ultimately, should contribute to
an improvement in the ability to predict potential future
release of RDX to groundwater and thereby assist in
defining any required remedial actions.
References
Chambre,
P. L., Pigford, T. H>, Futjita, A., Kanki, T,
Kobayashi, A., Lung, H., Ting, D., Sato, Y., Zavoshy, S.
J., Analytical Performance Models for Geological
Repositories, LBL-14842, Lawerence Berkley Laboratory,
University of California, Berkley, CA 1982.
Lever,
J. H.,
S. Taylor
, L. Perovich, K. Bjella and B. Packer.
Dissolution of Composition B Detonation Residules,
Environmental Science and Technology, Environmental
Science and Technology, 2005, 39, 8803-8811.
Lynch,
J. C.; Brannon, J. M.;Delfino, J.J. Dissolution Rates of
three high explosives compounds: TNT, RDX, and HMX,
Chemosphere2002, 47, 725-734.
Praxis,
2004. SERDP
Final Technical Report Corrosion of Unexploded Ordnance in
Soil Environments. April
2004. Praxis
Environmental Technologies, Inc.
Burlingame, CA.
Grenade
Range Management Using Lime for Dual Role of Metals
Immobilization and Explosives Transformation Treatability
Study
Dr.
Steven L. Larson,
Environmental Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineer Research and
Development Center, 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS
39180-6199, Tel: 601-634-3710, Fax: 601-634-3518
Dr. Jeffrey L. Davis, Environmental Laboratory, U.S. Army
Engineer Research and Development Center, 3909 Halls Ferry
Road, Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199,
Tel: 601-634-4846
W. Andy Martin, Environmental Laboratory, U.S. Army
Engineer Research and Development Center, 3909 Halls Ferry
Road, Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199,
Tel: 601-634-3710
Deborah R. Felt, Environmental Laboratory, U.S. Army
Engineer Research and Development Center, 3909 Halls Ferry
Road, Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199,
Tel: 601-634-3576
Gene Fabian,
Aberdeen
Test
Center
, 4264 Cowan Place,
Aberdeen
,
MD
21017
, Tel: 410-278-7421
Catherine Nestler, Applied Research Associates, Inc., 119
Monument Place, Vicksburg, MS
39180, Tel: 601-634-4650
Gregory O’Connor, US Army Armament, Research,
Development and Engineering Command, Armament Research,
Development and Engineering Center, Picatinny Arsenal, NJ
07806-5000, Tel: 973-724-5008
The
importance of live fire training for US forces cannot be
overestimated. The
success of our armed forces depends upon realistic
training utilizing the actual weapons and munitions that
will be used in theatre during strategic and tactical
operations. However,
a drawback of this type of realistic training is the
potential contamination of firing ranges.
Most munitions-contaminated soils found on training
ranges contain a mixture of compounds.
For hand grenade ranges (HGRs), the prevalent
munitions used are the fragmentation grenade, typically
composed of an iron shell and Composition B explosive
material. Hand
grenades can deposit trace amounts of both RDX and TNT at
the range. The
concentrations of RDX found on hand grenade ranges can
pose significant health and environmental concerns
depending on the range use.
Metals such as zinc, iron, manganese, calcium,
lead, chromium, copper, nickel, molybdenum, and vanadium
are also present. Studies
performed on ranges in both the United States and Canada
have shown that there is a large degree of variability in
munitions constituent type, concentration, size, and
spatial distribution occurring on ranges.
The application of hydrated lime is a useful and
cost effective technology to reduce explosives from
leaving live fire ranges.
Under experimental conditions, the alkaline
hydrolysis degraded the explosives before they left the
top 15 cm of treated HGR soils.
Lime application as a range management technology
is currently being demonstrated at active HGRs.
The field demonstration results from these ranges
will be used to develop a guidance document on lime
application for the dual role of metals immobilization and
explosives transformation at active HGRs.
As a result, U.S. military forces can continue to
take advantage of large scale live fire training to
support world wide operations, without significant
environmental limitations imposed as a result of munitions
use at ranges.
Military
Munitions Response Program Site Inspections for Formerly
Used Defense Sites – Munitions Constituents Sampling
Deborah
Dixon Walker,
RHSP, CHMM, US Army Engineering Support Center Huntsville, Military
Munitions Center of Expertise, CEHNC-OE-CX, 4820
University Square, Huntsville, AL 35816, Tel:
256-895-1796, Fax: 256-722-8709, Email: Deborah.D.Walker@usace.army.mil
The
June 2004 Department of Defense Financial Management
Regulation added a new cleanup performance goal for the
Defense Environmental Restoration Program. This goal is
“Complete site inspections or equivalent for 100% of
all munitions response sites by the end of 2010”.
In 2005, the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) initiated a programmatic Site Inspection
(SI) effort under the Military Munitions Response Program
(MMRP) for Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) on behalf of
the US Army. As
of 1Q07, approximately 330 SIs have been funded and are
underway throughout the US states and territories. This
presentation will provide a status update of the program
with a focus on the results to date of munitions
constituents sampling efforts. It is anticipated that data
for more than 100 sites will be available by summer 2007.
Top
|