Status
of Gasoline-Related Hazardous Waste Sites in Sensitive
Groundwater Resource Areas in Massachusetts
Darin
R. Warner, Ralph Tella and Henry J. Lord, Lord Associates,
520 Providence Highway, Suite 8, Norwood, MA 02062
An
analysis of data obtained from the Massachusetts
Department of Environmental Protection’s (MADEP)
hazardous waste site databases was conducted to determine
the status of gasoline-related hazardous waste sites (GRHWS)
within sensitive groundwater resource areas. Of the 199 identified GRHWS in Massachusetts, no
gasoline service stations situated in a zone of
contribution to a public drinking water supply have
achieved regulatory closure.
This study raises significant implications with
respect to the feasibility for regulatory compliance in
Massachusetts under current constraints for site closure.
This study was conducted to (1) quantify the number
of GRHWS in either a zone of contribution to a public
water supply well (i.e., Zone II) or other current or
potential drinking water source; and to (2) determine the
number of these sites that have been restored to
“background conditions” through active remediation or
have otherwise achieved a “Permanent Solution” as
defined by the Massachusetts Contingency Plan. A search
has identified 190 active GRHWS in sensitive groundwater
resource areas. As
indicated by the reviewed databases, most of these sites
are currently undergoing some form of remediation.
Nine (9) of the identified 199 GRHWS have achieved
some form of regulatory closure; however, only one (1) of
these sites is located in a zone of contribution to a
public water supply and is not a gasoline service station.
This analysis begs the question, whether
environmental professionals and regulators are in a
difficult position of implementing a mandate that compels
PRP’s to conduct remedial efforts that, to date, have
been unsuccessful. Furthermore,
it is probable that the majority of these sites are funded
through the State’s UST reimbursement program and
therefore it is fair to ask whether public resources are
being used to implement a policy that cannot work.
Top
|